3.4 sec in total
420 ms
2.8 sec
202 ms
Click here to check amazing JARTOM content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jartom.com
JARTOM - hale i magazyny do wynajęcia lub na sprzedaż, Magazyny, hale oferty JARTOM specjalistycznej firmy doradczej
Visit jartom.comWe analyzed Jartom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 420 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
jartom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
420 ms
437 ms
120 ms
25 ms
238 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Jartom.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to V2.zopim.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Jartom.com.
Page size can be reduced by 319.2 kB (30%)
1.1 MB
735.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jartom.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 633.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JARTOM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 240.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jartom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (30%)
56
39
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JARTOM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jartom.com
420 ms
www.jartom.com
437 ms
style_1200.css
120 ms
css
25 ms
biblioteka.js
238 ms
jquery.min.js
392 ms
dyn_menu.js
240 ms
anythingslider.css
249 ms
accept_cookie.css
250 ms
jquery.anythingslider.min.js
250 ms
jquery.fixedposition.1.0.0.js
358 ms
init.js
364 ms
prototype.js
605 ms
livepipe.js
376 ms
tabs.js
377 ms
cookieconsent.latest.min.js
470 ms
15611.jpg
946 ms
14885.jpg
1059 ms
logo_new.gif
134 ms
piksel.gif
135 ms
zadzwon_do_jartom.jpg
322 ms
17222.jpg
948 ms
15621.jpg
135 ms
15622.jpg
136 ms
15617.jpg
307 ms
15620.jpg
320 ms
15618.jpg
320 ms
15616.jpg
320 ms
15615.jpg
413 ms
15614.jpg
443 ms
15619.jpg
441 ms
16362.jpg
442 ms
17272.jpg
570 ms
17230.jpg
942 ms
17177.jpg
943 ms
15693.jpg
941 ms
5164.jpg
566 ms
8189.jpg
949 ms
10952.jpg
943 ms
2817.jpg
942 ms
3751.jpg
945 ms
9067.jpg
946 ms
6166.jpg
1036 ms
16507.jpg
1044 ms
12038.jpg
953 ms
15882.jpg
1118 ms
15692.jpg
1259 ms
6114.jpg
1035 ms
szukaj_oferty.jpg
1067 ms
gtm.js
92 ms
nsLtvfQoT-rVwGTHHnkeJqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
44 ms
gMhvhm-nVj1086DvGgmzB6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
77 ms
pFZGRS3ywNfpSqkEIed1Ww.ttf
94 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
conversion_async.js
19 ms
140 ms
collect
105 ms
collect
133 ms
widget_v2.132.js
15 ms
__$$__stringtable_lang_pl.js
37 ms
56 ms
ga-audiences
42 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
89 ms
aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==
5 ms
dark-bottom.css
32 ms
jartom.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
jartom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
jartom.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PL
PL
ISO-8859-2
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jartom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jartom.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-2. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
jartom.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JARTOM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: