9.4 sec in total
908 ms
8.1 sec
374 ms
Welcome to jnoptic.com homepage info - get ready to check Jnoptic best content right away, or after learning these important things about jnoptic.com
JNOPTIC
Visit jnoptic.comWe analyzed Jnoptic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 908 ms and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
jnoptic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value17.1 s
0/100
25%
Value13.4 s
2/100
10%
Value1,420 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
908 ms
1615 ms
682 ms
469 ms
3042 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Jnoptic.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jnoptic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 629.3 kB (52%)
1.2 MB
575.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Jnoptic.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 556.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 112.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jnoptic needs image optimization as it can save up to 112.0 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 400.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 400.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jnoptic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (23%)
31
24
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jnoptic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
index.php
908 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1615 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.css
682 ms
main.css
469 ms
jquery-1.11.1.js
3042 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
525 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1012 ms
bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
976 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
2348 ms
jquery.sudoSlider.min.js
1718 ms
common.js
1914 ms
main.js
1273 ms
bg02.png
785 ms
bg01.png
980 ms
logo.png
409 ms
1417098592i0.png
1131 ms
1419042291i0.png
1156 ms
1419042306i0.png
953 ms
1419039073i0.png
1350 ms
1419038866i0.png
1582 ms
1416575308i0.png
1881 ms
1416575029i0.jpg
2128 ms
1411829554i0.jpg
2141 ms
1416575050i0.jpg
2162 ms
1408893513i0.jpg
1952 ms
1424161495i0.jpg
2199 ms
1424159514i0.jpg
2595 ms
1408895145i0.jpg
2863 ms
1419039871i0.jpg
2588 ms
1419040234i0.jpg
2627 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
3165 ms
blank.php
2592 ms
jnoptic.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jnoptic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jnoptic.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jnoptic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jnoptic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jnoptic.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jnoptic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: