5.5 sec in total
878 ms
3.8 sec
823 ms
Click here to check amazing Johnway content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about johnway.je
Visit johnway.jeWe analyzed Johnway.je page load time and found that the first response time was 878 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
johnway.je performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value11.7 s
0/100
25%
Value15.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,040 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
878 ms
25 ms
68 ms
212 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Johnway.je, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Johnway.je.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (12%)
13.1 MB
11.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Johnway.je main page is 13.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 355.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Johnway images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 598.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 598.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 538.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnway.je needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 538.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (60%)
58
23
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnway. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.johnway.je
878 ms
fbevents.js
25 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
68 ms
jquery-ui.css
212 ms
form.css
134 ms
common-elements.css
141 ms
minimalist.css
159 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
138 ms
woocommerce.css
135 ms
style.css
198 ms
jquery.js
287 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
225 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
395 ms
jquery.transit.js
226 ms
flash_detect.js
267 ms
flowplayer.min.js
277 ms
css
35 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
322 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
304 ms
woocommerce.min.js
336 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
351 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
362 ms
vendor.js
561 ms
app.js
388 ms
js
95 ms
comment-reply.min.js
401 ms
wp-embed.min.js
415 ms
tooltip.min.js
437 ms
core.min.js
454 ms
datepicker.min.js
460 ms
widget.min.js
473 ms
mouse.min.js
485 ms
slider.min.js
504 ms
form.js
602 ms
autosize.js
530 ms
jquery.fileupload.js
540 ms
34 ms
style.css
489 ms
Johnway-Logo-Copy4.png
261 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
249 ms
slider2.png
1510 ms
food-into.png
1148 ms
phyto-page13.png
1331 ms
live-blood.png
1220 ms
book-now.png
254 ms
Get-Well-Hover1.png
612 ms
balnce.png
612 ms
analyze.png
612 ms
nourish.png
613 ms
stretch.png
614 ms
relieve.png
615 ms
align.png
615 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
216 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-kxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
27 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
30 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
29 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
27 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8xsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
26 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12bxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
27 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
27 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
212 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
28 ms
karlaregular-webfont.woff
211 ms
karlabold-webfont.woff
212 ms
fc.woff
358 ms
icomoon.woff
357 ms
www.johnway.je
831 ms
bx_loader.gif
142 ms
johnway.je accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
johnway.je best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
johnway.je SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnway.je can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johnway.je main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johnway.je
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Johnway. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: