4 sec in total
850 ms
2.4 sec
743 ms
Click here to check amazing Jolliffe S content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jolliffes.com
If you are looking for a firm of solicitors in Chester you can trust to look after you, your family and your business, then get in touch.
Visit jolliffes.comWe analyzed Jolliffes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 850 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
jolliffes.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value6.2 s
44/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
850 ms
77 ms
61 ms
78 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Jolliffes.com, 14% (8 requests) were made to Reviewsolicitors.co.uk and 14% (8 requests) were made to Cdn.yoshki.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (850 ms) belongs to the original domain Jolliffes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 225.2 kB (18%)
1.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Jolliffes.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 954.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jolliffe S images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jolliffes.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (48%)
54
28
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jolliffe S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jolliffes.com
850 ms
wzn1aha.css
77 ms
font-awesome.min.css
61 ms
slick.min.css
78 ms
main.css
160 ms
modernizr-3.6.0.min.js
247 ms
style.min.css
433 ms
p.css
80 ms
styles.css
220 ms
jquery.min.js
75 ms
js
107 ms
snippet.js
105 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
24 ms
headroom.min.js
68 ms
slick.min.js
70 ms
main.min.js
219 ms
analytics.js
74 ms
rs.js
136 ms
index.js
248 ms
index.js
253 ms
logo.svg
110 ms
00_ChesterHeader_v2-1990x835.jpg
402 ms
01_AboutUs_o-1-1024x615.jpg
289 ms
01_AboutUs-1-1024x615.jpg
113 ms
02_LawforBusinesss-1024x615.jpg
309 ms
03_LawforPeople-1024x615.jpg
183 ms
04_OurStyle-1024x615.jpg
263 ms
05_OurClients-1024x615.jpg
200 ms
06_OurTeam-1024x615.jpg
264 ms
07_OurPromise-1024x615.jpg
358 ms
08_OurHistory-1024x615.jpg
509 ms
09_OurInsights-1024x615.jpg
346 ms
logo-Legal500.png
401 ms
logo-CQ.png
401 ms
4ae7d14b-ab37-4456-ad37-a64633960ac0
207 ms
d
135 ms
2D9EF6_0_0.woff
324 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
93 ms
collect
25 ms
collect
50 ms
rs-widget-side.js
47 ms
55845r.html
75 ms
widgetnotify.js
101 ms
css
65 ms
rs-cleanslate.css
61 ms
rs-widget-side.css
45 ms
202 ms
responsive.css
17 ms
jquery.min.js
16 ms
yoshki-library.js
28 ms
Default.png
21 ms
_Default.png
10 ms
-Default.png
20 ms
=Default.png
13 ms
1px.gif
5 ms
web-widget-framework-96c2ac7dafdad68c4a30.js
32 ms
rs-widget-logo-white.svg
30 ms
logo-green-bg-250.png
25 ms
jolliffes.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
jolliffes.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jolliffes.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jolliffes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jolliffes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jolliffes.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jolliffe S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: