5.6 sec in total
248 ms
4.7 sec
610 ms
Visit js-group.global now to see the best up-to-date JS Group content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about js-group.global
Expand your company overseas, find international investors and developing distribution networks in Europe, the Middle East and Africa with our expertise and…
Visit js-group.globalWe analyzed Js-group.global page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
js-group.global performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
248 ms
2175 ms
182 ms
323 ms
313 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Js-group.global, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Js-group.global.
Page size can be reduced by 287.2 kB (20%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Js-group.global main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 657.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 143.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JS Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 49.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.3 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Js-group.global needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.3 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (82%)
73
13
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JS Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
js-group.global
248 ms
js-group.global
2175 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
182 ms
style.min.css
323 ms
classic-themes.min.css
313 ms
styles.css
311 ms
ctf-styles.min.css
316 ms
rella-font-icon.min.css
325 ms
font-awesome.min.css
328 ms
bootstrap.min.css
530 ms
progressively.min.css
418 ms
style.css
424 ms
theme.min.css
611 ms
button.min.css
449 ms
misc.min.css
437 ms
media.min.css
526 ms
flickity.min.css
567 ms
carousel.min.css
562 ms
icon-box.min.css
573 ms
magnific-popup.css
642 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
660 ms
contact-form.min.css
687 ms
counter-box.min.css
679 ms
custom-menu.min.css
685 ms
section-title.min.css
724 ms
social-icon.min.css
749 ms
custom.css
770 ms
js_composer.min.css
976 ms
rella-css-4717.css
819 ms
smartslider.min.css
803 ms
css
31 ms
jquery.min.js
861 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
867 ms
ajax-login-script.js
880 ms
modernizr.min.js
918 ms
img-aspect-ratio.min.js
931 ms
css
14 ms
n2.min.js
1036 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
1069 ms
css
14 ms
ss-simple.min.js
1034 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
911 ms
w-bullet.min.js
781 ms
index.js
812 ms
index.js
857 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
853 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
898 ms
TweenMax.min.js
960 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
842 ms
intersection-observer.js
803 ms
ScrollMagic.concat.min.js
850 ms
jquery.panr.js
838 ms
jquery.countTo.js
810 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
869 ms
akismet-frontend.js
837 ms
bootstrap.min.js
836 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
826 ms
progressively.min.js
771 ms
ofi.min.js
793 ms
retina.min.js
794 ms
theme.min.js
878 ms
custom.js
805 ms
analytics.js
73 ms
close-icon.cur
433 ms
Mobile_Logo.png
455 ms
Logo_main_White.png
482 ms
Hero_Image_1.jpg
697 ms
Hero_Image_3.jpg
761 ms
Home_slider_Business_Dev.jpg
698 ms
JS_Medical_01-30x19.jpg
615 ms
JS_Consulting_01-30x19.jpg
616 ms
Research_03-30x19.jpg
696 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf
83 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lP.ttf
131 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
862 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
101 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
102 ms
collect
54 ms
Counter-Image.jpg
709 ms
js
109 ms
Footer_London.jpg
1055 ms
js-group.global accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
js-group.global best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
js-group.global SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Js-group.global can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Js-group.global main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
js-group.global
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JS Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: