Tools & Wizards About Us
judgeservice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

judgeservice.com

Used car dealer reviews make buying your next used car easy with JudgeService.com - JudgeService.com

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

219 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

250 ms

judgeservice.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to judgeservice.com homepage info - get ready to check Judge Service best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about judgeservice.com

664,900 used car dealer reviews across the UK to view at JudgeService.com. View average star ratings of car manufacturers and dealers to make buying your next second hand vehicle easier.

Visit judgeservice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Judgeservice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

judgeservice.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,600 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.085

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.7 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

judgeservice.com

219 ms

www.judgeservice.com

477 ms

bootstrap.min.css

386 ms

global.css

201 ms

font-awesome.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Judgeservice.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (717 ms) belongs to the original domain Judgeservice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 153.1 kB (54%)

Content Size

283.0 kB

After Optimization

130.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Judgeservice.com main page is 283.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 133.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 26.7 kB

  • Original 35.4 kB
  • After minification 31.0 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 88.1 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Judge Service needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 27 B

  • Original 25.8 kB
  • After minification 25.8 kB
  • After compression 25.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 109.8 kB

  • Original 133.8 kB
  • After minification 127.8 kB
  • After compression 24.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Judgeservice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Judge Service. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

judgeservice.com

judgeservice.com

219 ms

www.judgeservice.com

www.judgeservice.com

477 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

386 ms

global.css

global.css

201 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

31 ms

JudgeServiceLogo_White.png

JudgeServiceLogo_White.png

199 ms

gb.png

gb.png

198 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

51 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

166 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

233 ms

jquery.dataTables.min.js

jquery.dataTables.min.js

446 ms

dataTables.dataSourcePlugins.js

dataTables.dataSourcePlugins.js

205 ms

dataTables.extensions.js

dataTables.extensions.js

204 ms

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.js

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.js

244 ms

global.js

global.js

283 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

284 ms

typeahead.bundle.js

typeahead.bundle.js

462 ms

handlebars.js

handlebars.js

717 ms

hogan.js

hogan.js

379 ms

index.js

index.js

380 ms

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

383 ms

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

508 ms

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

507 ms

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

424 ms

phpThumb.php

phpThumb.php

508 ms

road1.jpg

road1.jpg

424 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

4 ms

dc.js

dc.js

30 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

nr-892.min.js

nr-892.min.js

19 ms

Accessibility Review

judgeservice.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

judgeservice.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

judgeservice.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Judgeservice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Judgeservice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

judgeservice.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Judge Service. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: