3 sec in total
337 ms
2.3 sec
372 ms
Visit judicialactiongroup.org now to see the best up-to-date Judicial Action Group content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about judicialactiongroup.org
Visit judicialactiongroup.orgWe analyzed Judicialactiongroup.org page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
judicialactiongroup.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value260 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
337 ms
151 ms
143 ms
126 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Judicialactiongroup.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Judicialactiongroup.org.
Page size can be reduced by 906.7 kB (46%)
2.0 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Judicialactiongroup.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 989.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Judicial Action Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 704.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 704.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 113.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Judicialactiongroup.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (53%)
55
26
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Judicial Action Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
judicialactiongroup.org
337 ms
style.css
151 ms
template.js
143 ms
shadowbox.css
126 ms
shadowbox.js
192 ms
ext-min.js
696 ms
ext-all.css
407 ms
Carousel.css
250 ms
Carousel.js
266 ms
style.css
415 ms
buttons.js
7 ms
bg.jpg
198 ms
logo.png
300 ms
contribute1.png
343 ms
contribute2.png
202 ms
Screen%20Shot%202016-03-17%20at%2012.41.21%20PM.png
744 ms
readmore.jpg
258 ms
justice-scalia.jpg
866 ms
readfull.jpg
385 ms
issues.jpg
414 ms
LambofHopeSideAd.png
803 ms
all.js
268 ms
form_bg.jpg
641 ms
btn_bg.jpg
740 ms
menu_bg.jpg
798 ms
sep.jpg
799 ms
int_bg.jpg
853 ms
rotate_bg1.jpg
919 ms
rotate_bg2.jpg
1169 ms
home_bg.jpg
915 ms
red_home_head.jpg
965 ms
article_head_home.jpg
967 ms
ga.js
90 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
126 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
loading.gif
862 ms
next.png
865 ms
play_pause.png
887 ms
prev.png
925 ms
yellow.jpg
928 ms
blue.jpg
986 ms
getSegment.php
171 ms
checkOAuth.esi
30 ms
138 ms
xd_arbiter.php
212 ms
xd_arbiter.php
419 ms
t.dhj
8 ms
t.dhj
13 ms
cm
35 ms
x35248
105 ms
s-3271.xgi
5 ms
14 ms
hbpix
31 ms
6 ms
xrefid.xgi
4 ms
pixel
25 ms
pixel
15 ms
2981
32 ms
judicialactiongroup.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
judicialactiongroup.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
judicialactiongroup.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Judicialactiongroup.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Judicialactiongroup.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
judicialactiongroup.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Judicial Action Group. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: