2.4 sec in total
61 ms
1.7 sec
576 ms
Welcome to jvmhost.com homepage info - get ready to check JVM Host best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about jvmhost.com
Affordable and Quality Java Hosting provider since 2010
Visit jvmhost.comWe analyzed Jvmhost.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
jvmhost.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value250 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.105
88/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
61 ms
255 ms
56 ms
58 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Jvmhost.com, 23% (20 requests) were made to Cdn.jvmhost.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Livesupport.nodecluster.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) relates to the external source Livesupport.nodecluster.net.
Page size can be reduced by 625.9 kB (53%)
1.2 MB
548.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Jvmhost.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 688.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, JVM Host needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 442.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 442.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jvmhost.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 81.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (43%)
82
47
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JVM Host. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jvmhost.com
61 ms
www.jvmhost.com
255 ms
style.css
56 ms
output.css
58 ms
style.css
58 ms
buttons.js
31 ms
jquery.js
115 ms
style.css
59 ms
corners.css
61 ms
site.css
79 ms
site-root.css
81 ms
seal.js
192 ms
conversion.js
30 ms
trackingCode.js
31 ms
addthis_widget.js
18 ms
comment-reply.min.js
55 ms
style.css
31 ms
ga.js
30 ms
cot.js
16 ms
cot.js
62 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
bestprice2d.gif
63 ms
seal_image.php
62 ms
image.php
534 ms
servers2.jpg
61 ms
excellent-web-hosting.png
57 ms
57 ms
display.ashx
101 ms
logo.gif
48 ms
jvmhost2w.png
49 ms
ph0n3.png
49 ms
bg_nme.gif
49 ms
bb_ga.gif
49 ms
a_separa.gif
45 ms
WebHostingSearch-BestHostingAward.png
74 ms
ssd.png
254 ms
quest1.png
68 ms
29762.png
98 ms
xenvps.png
68 ms
newtlds.jpg
69 ms
paypal.jpg
97 ms
co-mb.jpg
99 ms
ipv6.jpg
96 ms
techno.jpg
162 ms
comodo.jpg
247 ms
ordernow.jpg
37 ms
demo2.gif
37 ms
ck15.png
37 ms
bgo.jpg
36 ms
tomee1.gif
89 ms
tomcat.jpg
37 ms
bt-or_s1.jpg
38 ms
jetty.jpg
38 ms
tomcatplus3.jpg
39 ms
jboss.jpg
39 ms
resin.gif
38 ms
geronimo.jpg
41 ms
glassfish.jpg
42 ms
x256.jpg
50 ms
x512.jpg
43 ms
x1024.jpg
49 ms
xen1536.jpg
50 ms
x2048.jpg
54 ms
testimonials6.gif
48 ms
server.php
601 ms
170 ms
26514257.png
156 ms
trackingCode.html
153 ms
300lo.json
59 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
66 ms
dpx
10 ms
dpx
7 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
33 ms
getSegment.php
176 ms
checkOAuth.esi
16 ms
t.dhj
18 ms
t.dhj
21 ms
cm
32 ms
s-3271.xgi
16 ms
hbpix
153 ms
8 ms
10 ms
pixel
18 ms
2981
18 ms
52154.gif
5 ms
style.css
284 ms
server.php
382 ms
jvmhost.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jvmhost.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
jvmhost.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jvmhost.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jvmhost.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jvmhost.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JVM Host. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: