4.4 sec in total
228 ms
3.1 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to kidston.com homepage info - get ready to check Kidston best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about kidston.com
World Classic Car Expertise
Visit kidston.comWe analyzed Kidston.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
kidston.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value2,230 ms
6/100
30%
Value1.533
0/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
228 ms
83 ms
160 ms
5 ms
244 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Kidston.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Kidston.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (6%)
17.0 MB
15.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Kidston.com main page is 17.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 16.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 822.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kidston images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 209.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 209.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kidston.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (14%)
87
75
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kidston. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
kidston.com
228 ms
style.css
83 ms
menu.js
160 ms
jquery.min.js
5 ms
prototype.js
244 ms
scriptaculous.js
178 ms
scroller.js
179 ms
swfobject.js
179 ms
main_bg.png
100 ms
builder.js
84 ms
effects.js
86 ms
dragdrop.js
82 ms
controls.js
84 ms
slider.js
83 ms
sound.js
92 ms
header_bg.jpg
84 ms
header_logo.png
86 ms
facebook.png
81 ms
twitter.png
81 ms
header_text_bg.png
84 ms
15.jpg
559 ms
32.jpg
658 ms
5.jpg
730 ms
17.jpg
786 ms
42.jpg
784 ms
27.jpg
628 ms
41.jpg
1039 ms
55.jpg
866 ms
56.jpg
1092 ms
46.jpg
1131 ms
36.jpg
1251 ms
44.jpg
1255 ms
19.jpg
1104 ms
16.jpg
1283 ms
2.jpg
1402 ms
54.jpg
1262 ms
13.jpg
1365 ms
39.jpg
1572 ms
29.jpg
1425 ms
59.jpg
1424 ms
6.jpg
1600 ms
30.jpg
1598 ms
47.jpg
1568 ms
53.jpg
1590 ms
23.jpg
1668 ms
11.jpg
1734 ms
28.jpg
1811 ms
24.jpg
1761 ms
22.jpg
1751 ms
45.jpg
1769 ms
ga.js
5 ms
4.jpg
1829 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
26.jpg
1816 ms
35.jpg
1839 ms
58.jpg
1848 ms
52.jpg
1863 ms
31.jpg
1973 ms
51.jpg
1464 ms
40.jpg
1364 ms
50.jpg
1422 ms
34.jpg
1365 ms
49.jpg
1330 ms
48.jpg
1365 ms
3.jpg
1318 ms
38.jpg
1181 ms
33.jpg
1153 ms
43.jpg
1157 ms
12.jpg
1147 ms
57.jpg
994 ms
18.jpg
1097 ms
main_content_bg.jpg
1038 ms
204_home.jpg
1042 ms
207_home.jpg
960 ms
203_home.jpg
943 ms
2549_1.jpg
936 ms
2547_1.jpg
954 ms
2546_1.jpg
833 ms
2552_1.jpg
832 ms
2556_1.jpg
836 ms
2559_1.jpg
833 ms
2545_1.jpg
841 ms
2558_1.jpg
790 ms
market_index_12-15.png
745 ms
6.jpg
738 ms
play_button.gif
743 ms
thumbnail2.jpg
748 ms
59.jpg
716 ms
kidston.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
kidston.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
kidston.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kidston.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Kidston.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
kidston.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kidston. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: