3.1 sec in total
209 ms
2.8 sec
93 ms
Welcome to lacosteah.com homepage info - get ready to check Lacosteah best content right away, or after learning these important things about lacosteah.com
Visit lacosteah.comWe analyzed Lacosteah.com page load time and found that the first response time was 209 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lacosteah.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value30.3 s
0/100
25%
Value24.3 s
0/100
10%
Value26,080 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value41.8 s
0/100
10%
209 ms
1183 ms
360 ms
73 ms
373 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lacosteah.com, 83% (62 requests) were made to Web4.lifelearn.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Connect.televet.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Web4.lifelearn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 168.0 kB (30%)
560.2 kB
392.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Lacosteah.com main page is 560.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 291.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lacosteah needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 38.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.5 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lacosteah.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (92%)
72
6
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lacosteah. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lacosteah.com
209 ms
web4.lifelearn.com
1183 ms
color-picker.min.css
360 ms
font-awesome.min.css
73 ms
style.min.css
373 ms
lifelearn-styles-admin.css
509 ms
style.css
70 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
102 ms
styles.css
518 ms
style_normal.min.css
117 ms
settings.css
134 ms
style.css
164 ms
ll-templates-retrofit.css
666 ms
font-awesome.min.css
237 ms
grid-system.css
695 ms
style.css
387 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
765 ms
css
84 ms
responsive.css
436 ms
style.css
444 ms
ascend.css
446 ms
addtoany.min.css
644 ms
jquery.min.js
324 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
332 ms
addtoany.min.js
353 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
370 ms
blueriver_promotion.js
388 ms
powered-by.js
388 ms
fts-global.js
414 ms
script.min.js
417 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
438 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
439 ms
bootstrap-popover.js
464 ms
ll-custom-script.js
467 ms
core.min.js
476 ms
menu.min.js
476 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
475 ms
dom-ready.min.js
484 ms
hooks.min.js
503 ms
i18n.min.js
502 ms
a11y.min.js
492 ms
autocomplete.min.js
502 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
506 ms
salient-social.js
514 ms
custom.min.js
521 ms
jquery.easing.js
516 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
390 ms
priority.js
378 ms
transit.js
320 ms
waypoints.js
331 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
337 ms
hoverintent.js
324 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
278 ms
superfish.js
265 ms
init.js
281 ms
touchswipe.min.js
272 ms
page.js
146 ms
analytics.js
109 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
46 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
47 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
47 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
43 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
43 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
61 ms
icomoon.woff
131 ms
collect
209 ms
shim.js
136 ms
accessibility.png
480 ms
eso.e18d3993.js
107 ms
sm.23.html
172 ms
connect.televet.com
13 ms
env.js
20 ms
main.1761d926.chunk.css
94 ms
3.b23c80af.chunk.js
138 ms
main.675b752c.chunk.js
107 ms
lacosteah.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lacosteah.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lacosteah.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lacosteah.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lacosteah.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lacosteah.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lacosteah. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: