6.4 sec in total
1.2 sec
5 sec
264 ms
Click here to check amazing Laser Beauty content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about laserbeauty.com
laserbeauty.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, laserbeauty.com has it all. We hope you ...
Visit laserbeauty.comWe analyzed Laserbeauty.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
laserbeauty.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
93/100
10%
Value3.4 s
65/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value380 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value6.1 s
63/100
10%
1165 ms
81 ms
147 ms
207 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Laserbeauty.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Laserbeauty.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (24%)
4.9 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Laserbeauty.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 157.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laser Beauty images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 397.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 397.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 572.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laserbeauty.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 572.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (66%)
70
24
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laser Beauty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.laserbeauty.com
1165 ms
aweber-form.css
81 ms
styles.css
147 ms
settings.css
207 ms
dynamic-captions.css
144 ms
static-captions.css
145 ms
style.css
269 ms
prettyphoto.css
210 ms
bootstrap.css
476 ms
font-awesome.css
214 ms
widget.css
281 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
283 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
279 ms
responsive.css
285 ms
jquery.js
406 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
350 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
419 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
487 ms
ibp_clickto_referral.js
258 ms
keyword_replacement.js
256 ms
flexslider.css
355 ms
comment-reply.min.js
413 ms
jquery.form.min.js
428 ms
scripts.js
475 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
546 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
483 ms
bootstrap.min.js
509 ms
modernizr.js
543 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.js
549 ms
functions.js
549 ms
jquery-scrolltofixed.js
557 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
659 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
623 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
543 ms
css
26 ms
css
39 ms
bootstrap.css
436 ms
datepicker.css
378 ms
shortcode.css
381 ms
font-awesome.css
457 ms
flexslider.css
459 ms
widget.css
460 ms
blog.css
462 ms
treatment.css
481 ms
shop.css
514 ms
masonry.css
521 ms
bg-landing2.jpg
655 ms
slide02.jpg
275 ms
laserweb-slide-VIDEO-intro-3.jpg
655 ms
slide03.jpg
180 ms
laserweb-slide-March-2016-Kybella.jpg
664 ms
laserweb-slide-ULTHERA-gen2015.jpg
651 ms
laserweb-slide-March-2016-BODYFX.jpg
326 ms
laserbeauty-logo-175.jpg
216 ms
gtm.js
83 ms
keyword_replacement.php
200 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
16 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
18 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEMbjGELOEJD5J8DUmxkO-A.ttf
25 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
24 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
23 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf
23 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
252 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
linkid.js
13 ms
collect
7 ms
collect
107 ms
bg-appointment.png
109 ms
bg-appointment.png
1228 ms
ga-audiences
90 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
35 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nL3QFSXBldIn45k5A7iXhnc.ttf
36 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf
34 ms
bg-main-patt.png
324 ms
bg-imgarrows.png
290 ms
timer.png
119 ms
loader.gif
118 ms
coloredbg.png
101 ms
shadow2.png
109 ms
bullet.png
103 ms
large_left.png
189 ms
large_right.png
190 ms
laserbeauty.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
laserbeauty.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
laserbeauty.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laserbeauty.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laserbeauty.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laserbeauty.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Laser Beauty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: