4.9 sec in total
320 ms
3.6 sec
1 sec
Visit leoclean.fi now to see the best up-to-date Leo Clean content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about leoclean.fi
Etsitkö parasta yrityssiivousta Helsinkiin? Siivousliike Leo Clean Oy tarjoaa siivouspalvelut yrityksille, liikekeskuksille, toimistoille, myymälöille yms.
Visit leoclean.fiWe analyzed Leoclean.fi page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
leoclean.fi performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value7.7 s
25/100
10%
Value2,560 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
320 ms
540 ms
99 ms
197 ms
291 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Leoclean.fi, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (917 ms) relates to the external source Service.giosg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 268.3 kB (11%)
2.4 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Leoclean.fi main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 130.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Leo Clean images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (58%)
86
36
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Leo Clean. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
leoclean.fi
320 ms
leoclean.fi
540 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
99 ms
style.min.css
197 ms
styles.css
291 ms
settings.css
293 ms
simple-banner.css
293 ms
css
45 ms
cleanco.css
292 ms
style.css
297 ms
fontello.css
316 ms
plugin_style.css
388 ms
js_composer.min.css
582 ms
select-theme-default.css
392 ms
jquery.js
486 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
393 ms
script.js
429 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
596 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
596 ms
simple-banner.js
491 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
534 ms
svgxuse.js
596 ms
modernizr.js
596 ms
bootstrap.js
641 ms
myscript.min.js
676 ms
comment-reply.min.js
678 ms
css
38 ms
css
38 ms
style.css
676 ms
bootstrap.css
677 ms
fontello.css
686 ms
flaticon.css
743 ms
css
38 ms
css
36 ms
css
36 ms
owl.carousel.css
771 ms
detheme.css
869 ms
customstyle.css
773 ms
animate.min.css
774 ms
owl_carousel.css
782 ms
scripts.js
868 ms
waypoints.min.js
870 ms
select.min.js
870 ms
select.init.js
789 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
766 ms
jquery.counto.min.js
683 ms
wp-embed.min.js
683 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
682 ms
owl.carousel.js
682 ms
fontello.css
669 ms
917 ms
gtm.js
61 ms
leologo.png
606 ms
logo_cleancoss.png
559 ms
dummy.png
107 ms
transparent.png
312 ms
animaatio-ympyra-kauppakeskussiivous.png
313 ms
animaatio-ympyra-toimistosiivous.png
313 ms
animaatio-ympyra-myymalasiivous.png
314 ms
animaatio-ympyra-hotellisiivous.png
313 ms
animaatio-ympyra-korkean-hygienian-kohteet.png
556 ms
animaatio-ympyra-porrastilasiivous.png
555 ms
animaatio-ympyra-liikuntakeskussiivous.png
555 ms
avainlippu.png
556 ms
henkilokuva-kiinteistohuolto-300x300.jpg
548 ms
henkilokuva-citycenter-300x300.jpg
653 ms
henkilokuva-doctagon-300x300.jpg
650 ms
henkilokuva-kamppi-300x300.jpg
651 ms
henkilokuva-kaari-300x300.jpg
652 ms
henkilokuva-stockmann-susanna-300x300.jpg
651 ms
logo-alppilankiinteistohuolto.png
653 ms
logo-citycenter.png
734 ms
logo-doctagon.png
794 ms
logo-kaari.png
732 ms
logo-stockmann.png
735 ms
analytics.js
256 ms
cleanco.woff
683 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
240 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
240 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
279 ms
flaticon.woff
487 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
403 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
405 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
408 ms
etusivu.jpg
799 ms
etusivu2.jpg
901 ms
collect
61 ms
polyfill.min.js
370 ms
animaatio-petri-hires.jpg
212 ms
animaatio-donald-hires.jpg
213 ms
animaatio-minna-hires-opt.png
213 ms
animaatio-eelika-hires.jpg
99 ms
animaatio-ned-hires.jpg
99 ms
animaatio-anne-hires-opt.png
101 ms
leoclean.fi accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
leoclean.fi best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
leoclean.fi SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FI
FI
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leoclean.fi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Finnish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Leoclean.fi main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
leoclean.fi
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Leo Clean. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: