22 sec in total
9.9 sec
11.8 sec
267 ms
Click here to check amazing Leopak content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about leopak.ru
Купить в Интернет-магазине «Леопак» товары упаковочной и хозяйственно-бытовой группы (одноразовая посуда, пленка пвх, пакеты) по низкой цене с доставкой
Visit leopak.ruWe analyzed Leopak.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 9.9 sec and then it took 12.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
leopak.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value7,700 ms
0/100
30%
Value1
2/100
15%
Value20.5 s
2/100
10%
9911 ms
1069 ms
1120 ms
505 ms
1883 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Leopak.ru, 10% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Leopak.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 517.5 kB (57%)
905.2 kB
387.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Leopak.ru main page is 905.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 391.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.8 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Leopak needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 286.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 286.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 99.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Leopak.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (41%)
37
22
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Leopak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
leopak.ru
9911 ms
jquery-1.4.4.min.js
1069 ms
main.css
1120 ms
jquery.maskedinput-1.3.min.js
505 ms
jquery.autocomplete.js
1883 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.21.custom.css
1212 ms
mousewhe.js
679 ms
1.png
1331 ms
logo2.png
1004 ms
xls-menu.png
1039 ms
car.png
890 ms
office.png
998 ms
homepage-image.png
1560 ms
7.png
544 ms
rss2.png
456 ms
sprites.png
275 ms
act-home.png
168 ms
target.png
440 ms
menu-div.png
245 ms
homepage.png
176 ms
target_white.png
246 ms
alpha.png
270 ms
homepage-arrows.png
375 ms
137lowcrop.jpg
387 ms
shadow.png
434 ms
180lowcrop.jpg
471 ms
183lowcrop.jpg
433 ms
149lowcrop.jpg
554 ms
114lowcrop.jpg
582 ms
136lowcrop.jpg
564 ms
111lowcrop.jpg
588 ms
135lowcrop.jpg
656 ms
169lowcrop.jpg
694 ms
br-stick.png
720 ms
evrazia.png
736 ms
watch.js
182 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_100_eeeeee_1x100.png
908 ms
watch.js
443 ms
advert.gif
85 ms
1
86 ms
leopak.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
leopak.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
leopak.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Leopak.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Leopak.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
leopak.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Leopak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: