6.3 sec in total
2.6 sec
3.5 sec
250 ms
Visit lifeha.ru now to see the best up-to-date Lifeha content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifeha.ru
Палим секретные фишки, читкоды, как иметь заработок в интернете. Бизнес идеи и прибыльные рабочие схемы по инвестированию. Будь в тренде! Подключайся к Лайфхакеру
Visit lifeha.ruWe analyzed Lifeha.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lifeha.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value7,850 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value24.8 s
0/100
10%
2559 ms
51 ms
49 ms
130 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeha.ru, 15% (9 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifeha.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 373.3 kB (49%)
769.0 kB
395.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifeha.ru main page is 769.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 337.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeha images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 183.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 183.4 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 125.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeha.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 125.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (64%)
58
21
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeha. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifeha.ru
2559 ms
font-awesome.min.css
51 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
span.js
130 ms
popup.js
189 ms
google-analytics.js
191 ms
yandex-metrika.js
193 ms
google-search.js
194 ms
widget.css
201 ms
style2-os.css
219 ms
lightbox.css
288 ms
font-awesome.css
287 ms
pagenavi-css.css
297 ms
style.css
297 ms
font-awesome.min.css
28 ms
ytprefs.min.css
306 ms
jquery.js
474 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
375 ms
video_gallery-all.js
372 ms
filereader.min.js
381 ms
cursor_position.js
380 ms
fronted.js
396 ms
sam-layout.min.js
465 ms
kaltura.js
466 ms
ytprefs.min.js
488 ms
navigation.js
479 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
479 ms
fitvids.min.js
540 ms
wp-embed.min.js
542 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
watch.js
432 ms
cse.js
66 ms
collect
12 ms
jsapi
34 ms
default+ru.css
11 ms
default.css
22 ms
default+ru.I.js
55 ms
default.css
28 ms
iframe_api
46 ms
logo.png
97 ms
phone.png
98 ms
message.png
97 ms
youtube-app-768x410.jpg
287 ms
logo_for_post.png
157 ms
78c2dacdb971b9f5dd32f9eb789e2e3c-300x244.jpg
253 ms
dotted.png
188 ms
lifeha-vkontakte-kak-zarabotat-150x150.png
282 ms
lifeha-facebook-kak-zarabotat-150x150.jpg
191 ms
lifeha-youtube-kak-zarabotat-150x150.jpg
250 ms
lifeha-instagram-kak-zarabotat-150x150.png
373 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
6 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
6 ms
www-widgetapi.js
7 ms
sam-ajax.php
364 ms
advert.gif
84 ms
1
85 ms
async-ads.js
32 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
25 ms
small-logo.png
28 ms
search_box_icon.png
27 ms
clear.png
63 ms
nav_logo114.png
27 ms
lifeha.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lifeha.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lifeha.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeha.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Lifeha.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifeha.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifeha. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: