5.3 sec in total
388 ms
3.3 sec
1.7 sec
Visit lifehover.com now to see the best up-to-date Lifehover content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifehover.com
Medulance offers emergency medical services like online ambulance booking, doctor on call, home consultation etc. at affordable prices in Delhi & Gurgaon.
Visit lifehover.comWe analyzed Lifehover.com page load time and found that the first response time was 388 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
lifehover.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value16.6 s
0/100
10%
Value32,330 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.234
53/100
15%
Value43.2 s
0/100
10%
388 ms
463 ms
71 ms
88 ms
150 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lifehover.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Payumoney.com.
Page size can be reduced by 746.3 kB (56%)
1.3 MB
594.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifehover.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 592.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.9 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lifehover needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 114.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 114.2 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 494.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifehover.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 494.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (51%)
67
33
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifehover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
medulance.com
388 ms
main.min.css
463 ms
font-awesome.min.css
71 ms
bootstrap-datepicker3.css
88 ms
bootstrap-timepicker.min.css
150 ms
jquery.min.js
111 ms
js
169 ms
js
225 ms
bundle.js
338 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
119 ms
angular.min.js
324 ms
bootstrap.min.js
133 ms
angular-route.js
117 ms
angular-resource.min.js
299 ms
angular-sanitize.js
175 ms
js
177 ms
ng-map.js
151 ms
jquery.cookie.js
174 ms
controller_v1.js
233 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.js
101 ms
bootstrap-timepicker.min.js
121 ms
platform.js
133 ms
angularjs-google-maps.js
150 ms
apiCtrl_v22.js
339 ms
bundle.js
373 ms
u8Zt_C2p1js
420 ms
111.png
1294 ms
logo.webp
166 ms
icon.png
167 ms
mobile-1.webp
448 ms
mobile-2.webp
411 ms
mobile.svg
410 ms
arrow.svg
407 ms
money.webp
640 ms
call.svg
633 ms
bulb.svg
672 ms
hand.svg
670 ms
medicine.png
668 ms
patient.png
675 ms
pet.png
814 ms
furniture.png
814 ms
%7B%7Bp.type%7D%7D.png
814 ms
a.png
813 ms
pt.png
815 ms
b.png
811 ms
m.png
925 ms
play.png
927 ms
appstore.png
1211 ms
mobileBg.webp
909 ms
play.png
909 ms
appstore.png
1252 ms
analytics.js
428 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
443 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1041 ms
AvenirLTStd-Book.otf
880 ms
www-player.css
291 ms
www-embed-player.js
362 ms
base.js
597 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
282 ms
gen_204
263 ms
sdk.js
302 ms
client:plusone.js
170 ms
fbevents.js
305 ms
collect
70 ms
collect
101 ms
collect
206 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
95 ms
sdk.js
107 ms
1700923533534130
429 ms
ad_status.js
406 ms
embed.js
192 ms
id
186 ms
Create
259 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
158 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
91 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
79 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
158 ms
lifehover.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lifehover.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lifehover.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifehover.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lifehover.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifehover.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifehover. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: