3.3 sec in total
317 ms
2.5 sec
512 ms
Visit lifesafetyservices.com now to see the best up-to-date Life Safety Services content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifesafetyservices.com
LSS provides fire safety services to ensure compliance with NFPA code for fire and smoke dampers and to protect your most important assets.
Visit lifesafetyservices.comWe analyzed Lifesafetyservices.com page load time and found that the first response time was 317 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lifesafetyservices.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value3,830 ms
1/100
30%
Value1.499
0/100
15%
Value20.6 s
2/100
10%
317 ms
333 ms
126 ms
58 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Lifesafetyservices.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to B2042625.smushcdn.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) relates to the external source B2042625.smushcdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 219.9 kB (13%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifesafetyservices.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 926.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 207.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 207.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life Safety Services images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifesafetyservices.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (71%)
90
26
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Safety Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 65 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifesafetyservices.com
317 ms
www.lifesafetyservices.com
333 ms
060c60a05c.js
126 ms
stat.js
58 ms
jquery.min.js
55 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
54 ms
page.js
118 ms
addtoany.min.js
53 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
66 ms
js.cookie.min.js
65 ms
woocommerce.min.js
104 ms
scripts.min.js
75 ms
js
218 ms
css2
103 ms
js
412 ms
v2.js
321 ms
email-decode.min.js
50 ms
2638022.js
492 ms
2638022.js
585 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
54 ms
order-attribution.min.js
54 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
53 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
53 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
53 ms
react.min.js
55 ms
hooks.min.js
59 ms
deprecated.min.js
59 ms
dom.min.js
62 ms
react-dom.min.js
344 ms
escape-html.min.js
59 ms
element.min.js
62 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
99 ms
i18n.min.js
99 ms
keycodes.min.js
343 ms
priority-queue.min.js
148 ms
compose.min.js
148 ms
private-apis.min.js
148 ms
redux-routine.min.js
148 ms
data.min.js
341 ms
lodash.min.js
341 ms
autoptimize_single_36878700722ad5c1f9c12d4c1c543977.js
342 ms
url.min.js
341 ms
api-fetch.min.js
404 ms
autoptimize_single_178f4d3163b38b06e6b4a00d28fbb566.js
404 ms
data-controls.min.js
404 ms
html-entities.min.js
403 ms
notices.min.js
403 ms
autoptimize_single_bdc1e466fc436dc223abbd653674f2ad.js
403 ms
autoptimize_single_d362db0897dcd4f234bab878252648ae.js
486 ms
dom-ready.min.js
485 ms
a11y.min.js
484 ms
fbevents.js
90 ms
gtm.js
313 ms
header-shadow.png
326 ms
hero.jpg
481 ms
primitives.min.js
458 ms
unsplash-2.jpeg
458 ms
appt-bg.png
816 ms
warning.min.js
601 ms
autoptimize_single_32eebd049df2f836e758e968164ef6fe.js
585 ms
autoptimize_single_da81d17da809a68f4d7dab3e8e0e1326.js
567 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
532 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
566 ms
sm.25.html
191 ms
eso.KJQApO2n.js
287 ms
js
186 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B4-Lw_3E.ttf
181 ms
HTx3L3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B2xY.ttf
247 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B47rx_3E.ttf
328 ms
HTxwL3I-JCGChYJ8VI-L6OO_au7B4873_3E.ttf
328 ms
header-shadow.png
289 ms
393 ms
js
197 ms
banner.js
358 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
334 ms
fb.js
273 ms
2638022.js
357 ms
leadflows.js
289 ms
lss-logo-full-color-tagline@2x.png
118 ms
autoptimize_423f597e8de9672fb8c9be502aa762fc.css
159 ms
analytics.js
163 ms
152 ms
header-shadow.png
254 ms
Hospital_slider_4.jpg
246 ms
product.png
243 ms
ZXuke1cDvLCKLDcimxBI5A.ttf
25 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
245 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
277 ms
fa-light-300.woff
310 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
455 ms
collect
34 ms
hero-2.jpg
594 ms
collect
58 ms
gt-1-k@2x.png
38 ms
marriott-1-k@2x.png
28 ms
nyp-1-k@2x.png
31 ms
pg-1-k@2x.png
28 ms
pfizer-1-k@2x.png
27 ms
toh-1-k@2x.png
74 ms
ucla-1-k@2x.png
52 ms
ga-audiences
14 ms
jack-1@2x.png
202 ms
icon-fire.png
204 ms
lifesafetyservices.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
lifesafetyservices.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lifesafetyservices.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifesafetyservices.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifesafetyservices.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifesafetyservices.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Life Safety Services. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: