2.2 sec in total
136 ms
1.5 sec
613 ms
Visit lifocus.com now to see the best up-to-date Lifocus content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifocus.com
Career Coaching Career Counseling. Our one-on-one coaching to achieve the right “fit” to achieve work-life balance.
Visit lifocus.comWe analyzed Lifocus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
lifocus.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
136 ms
263 ms
63 ms
66 ms
233 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Lifocus.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (554 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifocus.com.
Page size can be reduced by 694.9 kB (37%)
1.9 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifocus.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 811.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 252.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lifocus needs image optimization as it can save up to 252.9 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 373.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 373.4 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifocus.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (58%)
52
22
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifocus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifocus.com
136 ms
lifocus.com
263 ms
js
63 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
66 ms
2plc0.css
233 ms
g56le.css
180 ms
2plc0.css
340 ms
2plc0.css
200 ms
css
33 ms
2plbp.css
181 ms
g56le.js
175 ms
g56le.js
234 ms
adsbygoogle.js
70 ms
h5brp.css
236 ms
salient-social.js
237 ms
jquery.easing.js
262 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
287 ms
priority.js
289 ms
transit.js
294 ms
waypoints.js
296 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
325 ms
hoverintent.js
481 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
480 ms
superfish.js
482 ms
init.js
554 ms
touchswipe.min.js
482 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
482 ms
js
53 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
linkid.js
6 ms
collect
39 ms
collect
90 ms
gtm.js
92 ms
Lifocus-Career-Services.11jpg.jpg
81 ms
career-coach.jpg
81 ms
corporate-outplacement.jpg
146 ms
executive-coaching.jpg
82 ms
resume-linkedin.jpg
81 ms
twitter.png
82 ms
facebook.png
147 ms
linkedin.png
83 ms
oi-solutions.jpg
83 ms
show_ads_impl.js
323 ms
zrt_lookup.html
105 ms
thomas-wharton.png
288 ms
Providence-RI-Destination.jpg
355 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
46 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
213 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
215 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
216 ms
icomoon.woff
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
281 ms
2b50.svg
168 ms
ads
27 ms
sodar
45 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
107 ms
sodar2.js
22 ms
runner.html
16 ms
aframe
42 ms
BoEj1MRYnOy5BSN5ElbJySd6MGFyYBWT_ZtkFEIAVvM.js
4 ms
lifocus.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
lifocus.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lifocus.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifocus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifocus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifocus.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifocus. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: