Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

lipiflow.com

Leading Experts In Dry Eye & MGD Treatments | Dry Eye Experts | Lipiflow

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

969 ms

lipiflow.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lipiflow.com homepage info - get ready to check Lipiflow best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lipiflow.com

Dry eye effects millions worldwide. Find the information you need to educate yourself about dry eye causes and treatments. Learn more today.

Visit lipiflow.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lipiflow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lipiflow.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

lipiflow.com

73 ms

dryeyeandmgd.com

45 ms

dY1BDgIhDEUvNNDBxHgDV-70AlhKZKZQpRAzt1fHxIXG5U_e-88BSmkem4lSs9lBKsg9kAKqgraFSQcH2LVJNtEjnUVmE4nCSmCMZqWGEQ7pmvYs983otqD-41-I2vtvunWqi9UUqg2-zt_S9MQ880mOWIX5_7A5lZ_iK_YA.css

22 ms

css

67 ms

font-awesome.min.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lipiflow.com, 48% (48 requests) were made to Dryeyeandmgd.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (817 ms) relates to the external source Dryeyeandmgd.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (29%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Lipiflow.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 47.4 kB

  • Original 62.2 kB
  • After minification 55.9 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 125.6 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lipiflow images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 736.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 364.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 736.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 493.6 kB

  • Original 589.1 kB
  • After minification 577.3 kB
  • After compression 95.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lipiflow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 493.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (58%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lipiflow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

lipiflow.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lipiflow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lipiflow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lipiflow. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: