3.7 sec in total
1 sec
2.5 sec
182 ms
Welcome to liquidclaims.com homepage info - get ready to check Liquidclaims best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about liquidclaims.com
Securities Class Action Settlements
Visit liquidclaims.comWe analyzed Liquidclaims.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
liquidclaims.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value18.7 s
0/100
25%
Value14.5 s
1/100
10%
Value9,330 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.302
39/100
15%
Value18.1 s
3/100
10%
1015 ms
138 ms
16 ms
90 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Liquidclaims.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Liquidclaims.com.
Page size can be reduced by 356.0 kB (46%)
772.5 kB
416.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Liquidclaims.com main page is 772.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 439.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.9 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 103.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Liquidclaims needs image optimization as it can save up to 103.8 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 124.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liquidclaims.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 68.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (29%)
28
20
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liquidclaims. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.liquidclaims.com
1015 ms
style.css
138 ms
jquery-latest.js
16 ms
styles.css
90 ms
jetpack.css
184 ms
jquery.js
221 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
93 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
13 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
90 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
89 ms
superfish.js
90 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
352 ms
bg.jpg
273 ms
header.jpg
274 ms
logo.png
273 ms
slogan.png
275 ms
navbg.jpg
271 ms
discover.jpg
274 ms
optemize.jpg
276 ms
track.jpg
277 ms
recover.jpg
277 ms
featured.jpg
280 ms
left_arrow.png
274 ms
right_arrow.png
275 ms
claimprice.png
277 ms
rss.png
278 ms
bullet.png
278 ms
g.gif
4 ms
liquidclaims.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
liquidclaims.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
liquidclaims.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liquidclaims.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Liquidclaims.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
liquidclaims.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Liquidclaims. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: