3 sec in total
295 ms
2.5 sec
147 ms
Click here to check amazing Lirigal content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lirigal.com
Галлерея бисерных украшений в техниках херрингбоун,мозаика,бисероплетение,мастер класс турецкий жгут видео урок,вязанный жгут,американский жгут,датский жгут,кулон,кабошён,браслет,колье.
Visit lirigal.comWe analyzed Lirigal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 295 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lirigal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value2.6 s
87/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value750 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
295 ms
274 ms
244 ms
352 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Lirigal.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 12% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (734 ms) belongs to the original domain Lirigal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 53.9 kB (11%)
485.7 kB
431.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Lirigal.com main page is 485.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 342.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lirigal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 414 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 787 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lirigal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 787 B or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (30%)
46
32
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lirigal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lirigal.com
295 ms
default.aspx
274 ms
JScript2.js
244 ms
galleryStyle29.css
352 ms
show_ads.js
27 ms
lirigal_logo.gif
302 ms
rss.png
165 ms
lirigal_1005_m.jpeg
301 ms
lirigal_1003_m.jpeg
301 ms
lirigal_995_m.jpeg
300 ms
lirigal_998_m.jpeg
300 ms
lirigal_992_m.jpeg
297 ms
lirigal_988_m.jpeg
437 ms
lirigal_983_m.jpeg
473 ms
lirigal_979_m.jpeg
507 ms
lirigal_976_m.jpeg
506 ms
BW-2-2015.jpg
514 ms
BNB-01-02-2015.jpg
544 ms
BW-QE-2014.jpg
613 ms
BW-08-2014.jpg
674 ms
BNB140801.jpg
734 ms
designer_s.jpeg
593 ms
show_ads_impl.js
133 ms
lirigal_Video_1_m.png
439 ms
ga.js
13 ms
__utm.gif
66 ms
cookie.js
189 ms
integrator.js
200 ms
ads
192 ms
ads
598 ms
ads
73 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
56 ms
icon.png
92 ms
abg_lite.js
92 ms
window_focus.js
112 ms
qs_click_protection.js
111 ms
rx_lidar.js
145 ms
042791247ab671b2831aa311d6583330.js
133 ms
s
30 ms
css
39 ms
activeview
65 ms
adsbygoogle.js
102 ms
sodar
56 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf
149 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrzjJ5llpyw.ttf
158 ms
sodar2.js
85 ms
zrt_lookup.html
17 ms
integrator.js
22 ms
runner.html
14 ms
aframe
19 ms
lirigal.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
lirigal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
lirigal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lirigal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lirigal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lirigal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lirigal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: