3.7 sec in total
435 ms
3 sec
286 ms
Visit livingcom.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Living Com content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livingcom.co.uk
Fully managed broadband services and managed internet service for the Private Rented Sector. Landlord broadband.
Visit livingcom.co.ukWe analyzed Livingcom.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 435 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
livingcom.co.uk performance score
435 ms
1314 ms
82 ms
247 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Livingcom.co.uk, 79% (63 requests) were made to Browzer.co.uk and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Browzer.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 464.2 kB (41%)
1.1 MB
678.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Livingcom.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 541.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Living Com images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 249.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.9 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livingcom.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (32%)
74
50
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Living Com. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livingcom.co.uk
435 ms
studentcom
1314 ms
ccm.base.css
82 ms
jquery.js
247 ms
ccm.base.js
165 ms
43bcec77-881a-4ce4-9f0f-a2c98c8e99ff.js
88 ms
datepick.css
173 ms
browzer.css
265 ms
jquery.plugin.min.js
174 ms
jquery.datepick.min.js
180 ms
jquery.datepick-en-GB.js
244 ms
effects.js
263 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
263 ms
swfobject.js
6 ms
jquery.easing.js
282 ms
jquery.touchwipe.js
325 ms
jquery.history.js
327 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
348 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
348 ms
moment.min.js
350 ms
combodate.js
369 ms
modernizer.custom.js
406 ms
ate-latest.min.js
158 ms
retina.min.js
417 ms
cookie.js
434 ms
jquery.modal.min.js
435 ms
ate-latest.min.js
458 ms
browzer_mini.png
112 ms
browzer.png
111 ms
header_strap.png
111 ms
f18286.png
111 ms
f23188.jpg
388 ms
f23344.jpg
266 ms
f23330.jpg
198 ms
f1253.jpg
260 ms
f23324.jpg
197 ms
f23406.jpg
266 ms
f778.jpg
281 ms
f22768.jpg
364 ms
f23234.jpg
290 ms
f22776.jpg
362 ms
f22848.jpg
362 ms
f22992.jpg
367 ms
f23154.jpg
470 ms
f22994.jpg
453 ms
f446.jpg
546 ms
f13074.jpg
448 ms
f14480.jpg
451 ms
f13673.jpg
468 ms
f23344.jpg
535 ms
f1253.jpg
536 ms
f22994.jpg
546 ms
f13074.jpg
560 ms
f14480.jpg
560 ms
f23324.jpg
621 ms
f446.jpg
622 ms
footer_logo.png
630 ms
all.js
69 ms
search_grey.png
561 ms
search_white.png
576 ms
cross_white_small.png
580 ms
lifestyle.gif
633 ms
food.gif
633 ms
health.gif
650 ms
ga.js
30 ms
9093e944-c2da-4954-953f-ca2eb3a227dd.ttf
66 ms
2d4f1d98-ddb3-4acc-ae78-c8b1863f780e.ttf
91 ms
378b3a59-dd26-4da2-b7e3-edb4c737dcc5.ttf
92 ms
arrow_white_prev.png
614 ms
arrow_white_next.png
629 ms
play.png
633 ms
192 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
xd_arbiter.php
34 ms
xd_arbiter.php
97 ms
357 ms
entertainment.gif
529 ms
bx_loader.gif
531 ms
xd_arbiter.php
13 ms
livingcom.co.uk SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livingcom.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Livingcom.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livingcom.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Living Com. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: