2.1 sec in total
235 ms
1.6 sec
203 ms
Click here to check amazing Lola content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lola.in
DaaZ, largest domain marketplace simple, easy & secure platform to buy domain names. Buy this lola.in Domain at best price at DaaZ.
Visit lola.inWe analyzed Lola.in page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
lola.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value1,070 ms
24/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
235 ms
228 ms
256 ms
120 ms
115 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lola.in, 64% (28 requests) were made to Daaz.com and 27% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (487 ms) relates to the external source Daaz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 69.5 kB (20%)
342.4 kB
272.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Lola.in main page is 342.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 228.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lola needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lola.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (48%)
40
21
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lola. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
lola.in
235 ms
lola.in
228 ms
lola.in
256 ms
googlefonts.css
120 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
115 ms
icon.css
120 ms
style4.css
124 ms
logo.png
138 ms
trust-stamp.png
137 ms
jquery.js
225 ms
fittext.js
238 ms
platform.js
297 ms
js
66 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
68 ms
paymentgateway-logos.svg
288 ms
tooltip-icon.png
287 ms
money-back1.png
337 ms
transfer1.png
367 ms
secure-payment1.png
366 ms
twitterX2.png
454 ms
money-back-w.png
367 ms
money-back-img1.png
365 ms
money-back-img2.png
368 ms
money-back-img3.png
461 ms
transper-img1.png
456 ms
transper-img2.png
460 ms
secure-payment-img1.png
457 ms
secure-payment-img2.png
457 ms
default
134 ms
sdk.js
302 ms
view
421 ms
fontello.woff
487 ms
js
37 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
28 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
30 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
28 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
26 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
29 ms
twk-main.js
30 ms
twk-vendor.js
53 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
54 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
41 ms
twk-runtime.js
38 ms
twk-app.js
53 ms
lola.in accessibility score
lola.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lola.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lola.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lola.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lola.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lola. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: