2.9 sec in total
337 ms
2.3 sec
239 ms
Click here to check amazing Looking Point content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lookingpoint.com
LookingPoint is a full service IT solutions provider, for IT infrastructure services, including design, implementation and support services.
Visit lookingpoint.comWe analyzed Lookingpoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
lookingpoint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value56.2 s
0/100
10%
Value86,080 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value107.2 s
0/100
10%
337 ms
699 ms
152 ms
153 ms
153 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Lookingpoint.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (699 ms) belongs to the original domain Lookingpoint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 554.6 kB (53%)
1.0 MB
492.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Lookingpoint.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 539.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Looking Point needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 343.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 343.2 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 150.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lookingpoint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (42%)
48
28
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Looking Point. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lookingpoint.com
337 ms
www.lookingpoint.com
699 ms
smoke.css
152 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
153 ms
imageonly.css
153 ms
concat.css
265 ms
widcard.css
155 ms
jquery.min.js
38 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
60 ms
widcard.js
333 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
361 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
330 ms
jquery.cookie.js
331 ms
smoke.min.js
331 ms
system.js
408 ms
videolink.js
437 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
586 ms
common-scripts.js
451 ms
ga.js
31 ms
CorporateLogo.png
166 ms
search-btn.png
89 ms
nav-line-bg.png
161 ms
manageditservicesslide.jpg
247 ms
unifiedcommunications.jpg
248 ms
datacenterslide.jpg
433 ms
designconsultingslide.jpg
327 ms
managed-it-services.png
333 ms
unified-messaging-san-francisco.png
431 ms
managed-servers-san-francisco.png
436 ms
it-service-management-san-francisco.png
436 ms
cisco.jpg
592 ms
vmware.jpg
509 ms
emc-76x115.jpg
506 ms
barracudalogo76x150.jpg
591 ms
raging.jpg
657 ms
image-line-home-bg.png
577 ms
learnmore-slider-btn.png
641 ms
__utm.gif
72 ms
65246634
99 ms
learnmore-btn.png
572 ms
our-clients.png
641 ms
piwik.js
90 ms
player.js
142 ms
player.css
106 ms
ga.js
76 ms
vuid.min.js
130 ms
__utm.gif
44 ms
proxy.html
66 ms
436818069.jpg
107 ms
5342496_60x60.jpg
71 ms
lookingpoint.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lookingpoint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lookingpoint.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lookingpoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lookingpoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lookingpoint.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Looking Point. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: