3.7 sec in total
812 ms
1.9 sec
909 ms
Welcome to lovingtouchvets.com homepage info - get ready to check Loving Touch Vets best content right away, or after learning these important things about lovingtouchvets.com
Veterinarian in Fredericksburg, VA - Visit our skilled Veterinarian in Fredericksburg, VA. Accepting new appointments. Call today or request an appointment online.
Visit lovingtouchvets.comWe analyzed Lovingtouchvets.com page load time and found that the first response time was 812 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lovingtouchvets.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value14.5 s
1/100
10%
Value2,200 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.11
87/100
15%
Value24.1 s
0/100
10%
812 ms
18 ms
248 ms
18 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Lovingtouchvets.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) belongs to the original domain Lovingtouchvets.com.
Page size can be reduced by 510.6 kB (8%)
6.3 MB
5.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Lovingtouchvets.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 395.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Loving Touch Vets images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 424 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 600 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovingtouchvets.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)
72
27
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loving Touch Vets. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lovingtouchvets.com
812 ms
sgr.css
18 ms
jxt6kay.css
248 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
theme.min.css
34 ms
header-footer.min.css
35 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
36 ms
post-5.css
25 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
31 ms
swiper.min.css
32 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
42 ms
global.css
42 ms
post-8.css
42 ms
post-24.css
45 ms
post-119.css
45 ms
css
56 ms
fontawesome.min.css
49 ms
solid.min.css
48 ms
brands.min.css
46 ms
sgr.js
47 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
48 ms
widget-call-to-action.min.css
45 ms
widget-flip-box.min.css
51 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
53 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
51 ms
post-92.css
50 ms
animations.min.css
51 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
51 ms
jquery.min.js
59 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
52 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
58 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
57 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
57 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
56 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
58 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
66 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
66 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
71 ms
hooks.min.js
64 ms
i18n.min.js
54 ms
frontend.min.js
54 ms
waypoints.min.js
49 ms
core.min.js
44 ms
frontend.min.js
43 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
42 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
41 ms
platform.js
32 ms
p.css
38 ms
Artboard-9@2x.png
68 ms
Artboard-8.png
48 ms
Artboard-7-1024x569.png
47 ms
Artboard-12@2x.png
48 ms
Artboard-13@2x.png
50 ms
Artboard-14@2x.png
50 ms
Artboard-11@2x.png
52 ms
Artboard-15@2x.png
53 ms
Artboard-16@2x.png
54 ms
Artboard-12.png
51 ms
Artboard-17@2x-845x1024.png
59 ms
DOLLY.jpeg
56 ms
Flo-and-Emilie.jpeg
54 ms
jammie.jpeg
56 ms
tour_1.jpeg
57 ms
Opal-and-Mavi.jpeg
56 ms
Sasha.jpg
59 ms
Ginger-and-Joy.jpg
59 ms
Princess-Buttercup.jpg
60 ms
Artboard-20@2x.png
61 ms
Artboard-18@2x.png
56 ms
Artboard-19@2x.png
61 ms
Artboard-13.png
62 ms
Artboard-124@2x-300x193.png
61 ms
font
158 ms
d
112 ms
d
169 ms
d
155 ms
d
157 ms
d
123 ms
d
122 ms
d
157 ms
eicons.woff
111 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
114 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
49 ms
lovingtouchvets.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
lovingtouchvets.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lovingtouchvets.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lovingtouchvets.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lovingtouchvets.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lovingtouchvets.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Loving Touch Vets. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: