6.7 sec in total
1.6 sec
5 sec
115 ms
Welcome to ltr.com.tr homepage info - get ready to check LTR best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about ltr.com.tr
Ltr Bilgi teknolojileri LOGO, yazılım çözüm ortağı; yazılım çözümleri, satış ve desteği Yerinde ve uzaktan Destek Hizmetleri,
Visit ltr.com.trWe analyzed Ltr.com.tr page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ltr.com.tr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
1622 ms
30 ms
350 ms
218 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Ltr.com.tr, 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ltr.com.tr.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (75%)
1.9 MB
477.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Ltr.com.tr main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, LTR needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 796.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 796.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 563.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ltr.com.tr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 563.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (91%)
92
8
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LTR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ltr.com.tr
1622 ms
ga.js
30 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
350 ms
jquery-ui.theme.min.css
218 ms
minimalist.css
43 ms
gsc.css
218 ms
layerslider.css
326 ms
css
46 ms
styles.css
217 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
409 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
431 ms
calendar-jos.css
327 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
328 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
436 ms
settings.css
647 ms
style.css
437 ms
base.css
454 ms
buttons.css
515 ms
mfn-icons.css
538 ms
grid.css
546 ms
layout.css
862 ms
shortcodes.css
813 ms
variables.css
623 ms
animations.min.css
789 ms
colorpicker.css
649 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
730 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
752 ms
prettyPhoto.css
757 ms
responsive-1240.css
838 ms
responsive.css
869 ms
style.css
871 ms
style.php
1426 ms
css
57 ms
custom.css
918 ms
genericons.css
946 ms
jetpack.css
1074 ms
jquery.js
1184 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
973 ms
gsc.js
1025 ms
jsapi
36 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1159 ms
js
87 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
minimalist.css
53 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
3 ms
gprofiles.js
55 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
greensock.js
1111 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
929 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
975 ms
jelly.min.js
1036 ms
file-upload.js
950 ms
calendar.js
974 ms
calendar_function.js
972 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1168 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1188 ms
core.min.js
975 ms
widget.min.js
974 ms
mouse.min.js
977 ms
resizable.min.js
1074 ms
draggable.min.js
1012 ms
button.min.js
987 ms
position.min.js
992 ms
dialog.min.js
957 ms
jquery.form.min.js
982 ms
scripts.js
979 ms
slider.min.js
900 ms
spinner.min.js
894 ms
effect.min.js
922 ms
effect-shake.min.js
912 ms
wpgroho.js
914 ms
sortable.min.js
893 ms
tabs.min.js
869 ms
accordion.min.js
884 ms
animations.min.js
915 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
894 ms
colorpicker.js
893 ms
jquery.plugins.js
1188 ms
mfn.menu.js
819 ms
scripts.js
994 ms
comment-reply.min.js
760 ms
wp-embed.min.js
760 ms
box_shadow.png
348 ms
ltr.png
350 ms
top_bar_right_shadow.png
400 ms
transparent.png
426 ms
mfn-icons.woff
680 ms
hovercard.css
39 ms
services.css
53 ms
loader.gif
112 ms
shadow2.png
112 ms
tp-leftarrow.png
112 ms
tp-rightarrow.png
150 ms
g.gif
7 ms
ltr.com.tr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
ltr.com.tr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ltr.com.tr SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
TR
TR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ltr.com.tr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ltr.com.tr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ltr.com.tr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LTR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: