7.6 sec in total
196 ms
6.9 sec
525 ms
Visit luvncare.net now to see the best up-to-date Luvncare content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about luvncare.net
Veterinarian providing high-quality pet care for residents of Longwood, Lake Mary, Sanford, Casselberry, Apopka, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs and more.
Visit luvncare.netWe analyzed Luvncare.net page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
luvncare.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value17.2 s
0/100
10%
Value24,090 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.385
27/100
15%
Value34.7 s
0/100
10%
196 ms
527 ms
206 ms
200 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Luvncare.net, 8% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Script.crazyegg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Luvncare.net.
Page size can be reduced by 623.5 kB (31%)
2.0 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Luvncare.net main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 807.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 200.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luvncare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 80.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.0 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 331.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luvncare.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 331.4 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (73%)
79
21
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luvncare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
luvncare.net
196 ms
www.luvncare.net
527 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
206 ms
clentalak-public.min.css
200 ms
styles.css
198 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
197 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
203 ms
rgs.css
205 ms
font-awesome.min.css
384 ms
style.css
589 ms
magnific.css
401 ms
responsive.css
466 ms
nectar-slider.css
397 ms
select2.css
403 ms
ascend.css
572 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
728 ms
js_composer.min.css
716 ms
css
83 ms
jquery.js
745 ms
apbct-public-bundle.min.js
781 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
849 ms
conversion.js
79 ms
widget.js
81 ms
style.css
824 ms
core.min.js
1072 ms
widget.min.js
1162 ms
position.min.js
1162 ms
menu.min.js
1309 ms
wp-a11y.min.js
1308 ms
autocomplete.min.js
1302 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
1383 ms
scripts.js
1434 ms
modernizr.js
1434 ms
magnific.js
2300 ms
superfish.js
2302 ms
init.js
3321 ms
nectar-slider.js
3320 ms
touchswipe.min.js
2985 ms
select2.min.js
3350 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
3429 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
3443 ms
wp-embed.min.js
3566 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
3725 ms
parallax.js
3828 ms
analytics.js
469 ms
luvncare-facebook-150x150.png
1255 ms
luvncare-ah-horizontal2.png
4094 ms
aaha-accredited.png
4194 ms
avma-vert.png
4193 ms
AEMV-Logo-e1554328491958.png
4236 ms
ChiLogo.png
4360 ms
AAHA-logo.png
4360 ms
luvncare-twitter.png
1286 ms
luvncare-google-150x150.png
1286 ms
0104.js
450 ms
345 ms
F7H__iyEhsY
1146 ms
www.luvncare.net
4226 ms
canstockphoto29904474.jpg
4442 ms
canstockphoto215623562.jpg
4380 ms
diagonal_line.png
4319 ms
luvncare-heart-shadow.png
4476 ms
icomoon.woff
4430 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
4555 ms
878 ms
collect
755 ms
www.luvncare.net.json
749 ms
www-player.css
169 ms
www-embed-player.js
237 ms
base.js
402 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
87 ms
luvncare-facebook-150x150.png
3422 ms
350 ms
a18bb0e21d11a839b7adb013c92ee611.js
76 ms
luvncare-twitter.png
3450 ms
luvncare-google-150x150.png
3497 ms
luvncare-instagram-150x150.png
3521 ms
ad_status.js
433 ms
JvCqqlKDWxh3fBIjR_Q6tqdWI7LpeJg2tF6wEWG4A0E.js
241 ms
embed.js
135 ms
id
92 ms
Create
270 ms
st.js
984 ms
canstockphoto4721683.jpg
503 ms
canstockphoto386389692.jpg
310 ms
106 ms
GenerateIT
15 ms
canstockphoto386389692.jpg
785 ms
canstockphoto4721683.jpg
784 ms
log_event
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
336 ms
luvncare.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
luvncare.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
luvncare.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luvncare.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luvncare.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
luvncare.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Luvncare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: