Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

lympo.io

Lympo - Forging The Future of Blockchain & Sport

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

653 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

lympo.io screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lympo content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lympo.io

It looks like you're early. The Lympo NFT platform is undergoing changes – prepare to experience a new era of Lympo and get ready for the world of SPORT!

Visit lympo.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Lympo.io page load time and found that the first response time was 653 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lympo.io performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value22,890 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lympo.io

653 ms

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

643 ms

511.2f39fd537f30f109.js

467 ms

426.d3d31368b7cd13a5.js

409 ms

webpack-97279605e58c87a4.js

419 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Lympo.io, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lympo.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 96.6 kB (85%)

Content Size

113.4 kB

After Optimization

16.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Lympo.io main page is 113.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 112.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 96.6 kB

  • Original 112.8 kB
  • After minification 112.7 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 35 B

  • Original 586 B
  • After minification 586 B
  • After compression 551 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (34%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lympo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lympo.io accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lympo.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lympo.io SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lympo.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lympo.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lympo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: