Tools & Wizards About Us
lyricalpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

lyricalpress.com

Kensington Publishing Corp: Home

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

476 ms

lyricalpress.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lyricalpress content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lyricalpress.com

Visit lyricalpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lyricalpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Lyricalpress.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

lyricalpress.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

lyricalpress.com

30 ms

www.ekensingtonbooks.com

163 ms

css

33 ms

bootstrap.css

11 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lyricalpress.com, 72% (67 requests) were made to Ekensingtonbooks.com and 12% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (446 ms) relates to the external source Bitstorm.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (54%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lyricalpress.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 296.7 kB

  • Original 357.0 kB
  • After minification 344.6 kB
  • After compression 60.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 296.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 762.8 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lyricalpress needs image optimization as it can save up to 762.8 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 519.0 kB

  • Original 646.6 kB
  • After minification 466.7 kB
  • After compression 127.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 519.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 185.2 kB

  • Original 216.2 kB
  • After minification 155.8 kB
  • After compression 31.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lyricalpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 185.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (41%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

45

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lyricalpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lyricalpress.com

lyricalpress.com

30 ms

www.ekensingtonbooks.com

www.ekensingtonbooks.com

163 ms

css

css

33 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

11 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

18 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

10 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

16 ms

styles.css

styles.css

20 ms

kb-responsive.css

kb-responsive.css

17 ms

homepagenew.css

homepagenew.css

21 ms

styles-ie.css

styles-ie.css

19 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

48 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

24 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

21 ms

jquery-jtemplates.js

jquery-jtemplates.js

21 ms

jquery.valid8-1.2.2.js

jquery.valid8-1.2.2.js

22 ms

jquery.animate-shadow.js

jquery.animate-shadow.js

446 ms

jquery.preloader.js

jquery.preloader.js

21 ms

previewlib.js

previewlib.js

29 ms

jquery.iframe-transport.js

jquery.iframe-transport.js

22 ms

init.js

init.js

21 ms

jquery.anystretch.min.js

jquery.anystretch.min.js

29 ms

blur.js

blur.js

22 ms

PositionSticky.js

PositionSticky.js

23 ms

jQuery.positionSticky.js

jQuery.positionSticky.js

21 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

22 ms

jquery-spin.js

jquery-spin.js

23 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

23 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

24 ms

nrecosite.common.js

nrecosite.common.js

23 ms

nrecosite.user.js

nrecosite.user.js

23 ms

previewlib.js

previewlib.js

50 ms

jquery.anystretch.min.js

jquery.anystretch.min.js

47 ms

previewlib_8eb3a7c16c36dece7c3aa798548598d0__en.js

previewlib_8eb3a7c16c36dece7c3aa798548598d0__en.js

2 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

148 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

46 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

43 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

45 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

44 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

46 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

45 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

46 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

72 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

71 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

72 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

102 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

103 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

103 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

102 ms

logo-norton.png

logo-norton.png

96 ms

heart.png

heart.png

96 ms

all.js

all.js

330 ms

glyphicons-halflings-white.png

glyphicons-halflings-white.png

83 ms

ico-search.png

ico-search.png

86 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

78 ms

e_book_wrapper.png

e_book_wrapper.png

62 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

77 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

62 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

78 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

79 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

90 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

82 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

192 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

193 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

191 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

91 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

192 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

193 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

195 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

195 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

193 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

195 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

25 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

26 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

28 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

28 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

27 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

27 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

27 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

166 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

169 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

167 ms

mainFilesystem

mainFilesystem

167 ms

QHIOz1iKF3bIEzRdDFaf5ZEdosCNS0EvOwDBzJZsz8o.ttf

QHIOz1iKF3bIEzRdDFaf5ZEdosCNS0EvOwDBzJZsz8o.ttf

19 ms

pR0sBQVcY0JZc_ciXjFsKwAUTJOA6-irsSazDq377BE.ttf

pR0sBQVcY0JZc_ciXjFsKwAUTJOA6-irsSazDq377BE.ttf

18 ms

kH7K4InNTm7mmOXXjrA5v_gg4qM5Rpmu0ASAribBgqE.ttf

kH7K4InNTm7mmOXXjrA5v_gg4qM5Rpmu0ASAribBgqE.ttf

18 ms

EgBlzoNBIHxNPCMwXaAhYPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

EgBlzoNBIHxNPCMwXaAhYPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

20 ms

110 ms

ga.js

ga.js

13 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

29 ms

89.gif

89.gif

29 ms

SEO Factors

lyricalpress.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lyricalpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lyricalpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lyricalpress.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lyricalpress. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: