Tools & Wizards About Us
synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com

Home | Synchronize Within, LLC | New Paltz, New York

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

500 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

245 ms

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Synchronize Within Liveeditaurora content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com

A place for Highly Sensitive People to receive support, connect with their virtual HSP community, and develop their 5 Masteries to Synchronize Your Life.

Visit synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com page load time and found that the first response time was 500 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.141

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com

500 ms

css

100 ms

form-limited-bootstrap.min.css

40 ms

aurora-modals.min.css

110 ms

font-awesome.min.css

137 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com, 17% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (500 ms) belongs to the original domain Synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 34.2 kB (13%)

Content Size

258.5 kB

After Optimization

224.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com main page is 258.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 144.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 19.0 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 56.2 kB
  • After minification 41.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Synchronize Within Liveeditaurora needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 434 B

  • Original 144.6 kB
  • After minification 144.6 kB
  • After compression 144.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 74 B

  • Original 34.9 kB
  • After minification 34.9 kB
  • After compression 34.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (86%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

4

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Synchronize Within Liveeditaurora. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com

500 ms

css

css

100 ms

form-limited-bootstrap.min.css

form-limited-bootstrap.min.css

40 ms

aurora-modals.min.css

aurora-modals.min.css

110 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

137 ms

video-js.min.css

video-js.min.css

130 ms

jquery.galleryview-3.0-dev.min.css

jquery.galleryview-3.0-dev.min.css

134 ms

liveedit.global.min.css

liveedit.global.min.css

116 ms

design.css

design.css

199 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

145 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

198 ms

jquery.browser.min.js

jquery.browser.min.js

116 ms

jquery.touch.min.js

jquery.touch.min.js

116 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

125 ms

bootstrap-growl.min.js

bootstrap-growl.min.js

136 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

138 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

139 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

141 ms

video.min.js

video.min.js

156 ms

jquery.timers-1.2.min.js

jquery.timers-1.2.min.js

175 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

163 ms

jquery.galleryview-3.0-dev.min.js

jquery.galleryview-3.0-dev.min.js

176 ms

liveedit.base.min.js

liveedit.base.min.js

184 ms

design.js

design.js

391 ms

css

css

19 ms

css

css

30 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

225 ms

The_Center_for_Highly_Sensitive_People_copy1_600x272.png

The_Center_for_Highly_Sensitive_People_copy1_600x272.png

414 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

137 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

137 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

138 ms

RWmMoKWR9v4ksMfaWd_JN9XFiaE.ttf

RWmMoKWR9v4ksMfaWd_JN9XFiaE.ttf

153 ms

Z9XVDmdMWRiN1_T9Z7TZ6Ok.ttf

Z9XVDmdMWRiN1_T9Z7TZ6Ok.ttf

153 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

88 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

154 ms

collect

collect

54 ms

Accessibility Review

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

synchronizewithin.liveeditaurora.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Synchronize Within Liveeditaurora. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: