1.4 sec in total
42 ms
728 ms
628 ms
Welcome to marketingstudies.net homepage info - get ready to check Marketing Studies best content right away, or after learning these important things about marketingstudies.net
RSS marketing and RSS publishing latest news, developments and advice, plus a look at the different marketing approach from real-life experience.
Visit marketingstudies.netWe analyzed Marketingstudies.net page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
marketingstudies.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
95/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
27/100
10%
42 ms
30 ms
8 ms
15 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Marketingstudies.net, 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (294 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.
Page size can be reduced by 74.2 kB (1%)
9.2 MB
9.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Marketingstudies.net main page is 9.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 9.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.7 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Marketing Studies images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marketingstudies.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (28%)
46
33
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Marketing Studies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
marketingstudies.net
42 ms
marketingstudies.net
30 ms
urchin.js
8 ms
v4.css
15 ms
js
45 ms
base.css
14 ms
vendor.css
13 ms
main.css
13 ms
modernizr.js
12 ms
pace.min.js
14 ms
jquery-3.2.1.min.js
26 ms
plugins.js
28 ms
main.js
27 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
font-awesome.min.css
76 ms
fonts.css
13 ms
js
294 ms
hero-bg.jpg
53 ms
icon-search.svg
43 ms
gears-s.jpg
46 ms
featured-watch.jpg
45 ms
featured-beetle.jpg
49 ms
cup-of-coffee2.jpg
47 ms
ipad-234.jpg
47 ms
tv-room.jpg
49 ms
startup-con.jpg
50 ms
gallery-1-400.jpg
48 ms
gallery-2-400.jpg
58 ms
gallery-3-400.jpg
53 ms
architecture-23.jpg
55 ms
book-21.jpg
53 ms
raining.jpg
57 ms
office-work.jpg
56 ms
analytics.jpg
61 ms
ecommerce.jpg
53 ms
social-media.jpg
58 ms
survey.jpg
57 ms
marketing-strategies.jpg
62 ms
laptop123.jpg
59 ms
teamwork.jpg
61 ms
email-marketing.png
61 ms
urban-city.jpg
65 ms
handshake23.jpg
62 ms
change.jpg
64 ms
analyzing77.jpg
63 ms
icon-arrow-up.svg
65 ms
metropolis-semibold-webfont.woff
191 ms
metropolis-regular-webfont.woff
220 ms
metropolis-bold-webfont.woff
220 ms
librebaskerville-bold-webfont.woff
220 ms
metropolis-medium-webfont.woff
126 ms
js
105 ms
analytics.js
98 ms
marketingstudies.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
marketingstudies.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
marketingstudies.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marketingstudies.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Marketingstudies.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
marketingstudies.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Marketing Studies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: