9.1 sec in total
1.6 sec
6.8 sec
668 ms
Visit mediaclick.de now to see the best up-to-date Media Click content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mediaclick.de
Beratung, SEO, Webdesign, Websoftware, Webshops. Datenbanken, Kommunikationslösungen, Integration von Software. Erfahren Sie mehr …
Visit mediaclick.deWe analyzed Mediaclick.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
mediaclick.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value2.9 s
81/100
25%
Value5.0 s
62/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.535
14/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
1573 ms
163 ms
192 ms
193 ms
381 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Mediaclick.de, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Mediaclick.de.
Page size can be reduced by 901.7 kB (50%)
1.8 MB
913.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Mediaclick.de main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 798.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Media Click images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 577.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 577.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 224.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mediaclick.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 224.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (61%)
76
30
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Media Click. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mediaclick.de
1573 ms
twemoji.js
163 ms
wp-emoji.js
192 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
193 ms
settings.css
381 ms
css
24 ms
default.css
286 ms
css
40 ms
third-parties.css
292 ms
style.css
250 ms
css
42 ms
css
43 ms
jquery.js
561 ms
jquery-migrate.js
381 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
442 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
378 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
577 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
662 ms
custom.js
476 ms
ninja-forms-display.css
419 ms
qtip.css
475 ms
jquery.rating.css
513 ms
ninja-forms-modal-display.css
514 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
570 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
593 ms
underscore.min.js
607 ms
wp-util.js
608 ms
backbone.min.js
614 ms
wp-playlist.js
662 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
686 ms
plugins.min.js
699 ms
scripts.min.js
702 ms
comment-reply.js
704 ms
wp-embed.js
707 ms
jquery.form.js
757 ms
ninja-forms-display.min.js
777 ms
jquery.modal.min.js
792 ms
jquery.modal.options.js
795 ms
style.css
810 ms
logo.gif
169 ms
logo_retina.png
165 ms
janne-alex.jpg
787 ms
ernst-2.jpg
785 ms
markus.jpg
785 ms
alex.jpg
790 ms
nico.jpg
786 ms
christian.jpg
786 ms
stefan.jpg
883 ms
thumbs-beratung.gif
787 ms
thumb-ecommerce.gif
788 ms
thumb-websites1.gif
789 ms
Suchmaschinenoptimierung.png
788 ms
it-for-buisness-2016-thumb.png
789 ms
handwerker30001-150x150.jpg
790 ms
kinderwege-150x150.jpg
790 ms
vacancycard_projekt_mediaclick-150x150.png
795 ms
stellenangebot-mediaclick.png
791 ms
mizu_projekteheader1-150x150.png
792 ms
html5.png
793 ms
php.png
794 ms
symfony.png
796 ms
redaxo.png
797 ms
wordpress.png
797 ms
oxid.png
799 ms
java.png
798 ms
drupal.png
877 ms
PartnerBadge-151030.png
878 ms
oxid-esales-basic-level-partner.png
878 ms
flaschenpost.png
880 ms
anfahrt.png
871 ms
vcard.png
941 ms
fontello.woff
1099 ms
Digitizer.jpg
907 ms
piwik.js
583 ms
analytics.js
571 ms
cross.png
176 ms
collect
22 ms
mediaclick.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
mediaclick.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
mediaclick.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediaclick.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mediaclick.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mediaclick.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Media Click. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: