6.1 sec in total
927 ms
4.7 sec
457 ms
Visit megabit.net now to see the best up-to-date MEGABIT content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about megabit.net
Ihr Full Service IT Dienstleister in Mönchengladbach, IT Support, Internet, IT Sicherheit, Netzwerk, Server, Linux, Windows, Rechenzentrum
Visit megabit.netWe analyzed Megabit.net page load time and found that the first response time was 927 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
megabit.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value19.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value440 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.396
25/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
927 ms
189 ms
193 ms
192 ms
9 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Megabit.net, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Megabit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (31%)
4.0 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Megabit.net main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 931.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, MEGABIT needs image optimization as it can save up to 931.8 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 210.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Megabit.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (47%)
75
40
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MEGABIT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.megabit.net
927 ms
style.css
189 ms
jqtransform.css
193 ms
demo.css
192 ms
jquery.min.js
9 ms
jquery.jqtransform.js
206 ms
skin.css
205 ms
bgstretcher.js
206 ms
styles.css
281 ms
shortcodes.css
285 ms
jquery-ui.css
285 ms
custom-contact-forms-standards.css
289 ms
custom-contact-forms.css
290 ms
jquery.js
578 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
375 ms
custom-contact-forms-datepicker.js
377 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
474 ms
custom-contact-forms.js
378 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
300 ms
comment-reply.min.js
387 ms
core.min.js
389 ms
datepicker.min.js
483 ms
jquery.form.min.js
394 ms
scripts.js
481 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
360 ms
analytics.js
14 ms
logo.png
192 ms
menu_bg.jpg
110 ms
Fotolia_53646394_Subscription_XXL_edit.jpg
481 ms
Fotolia_43158301_Storch-rechts_929x287.jpg
190 ms
Fotolia_45637676_Subscription_XXL_edit.jpg
488 ms
Fotolia_42656926_Subscription_XXL_edit1.jpg
471 ms
Fotolia_41456411_Subscription_XXL_edit1.jpg
587 ms
Fotolia_49910466_Subscription_XXL_edit1.jpg
660 ms
Fotolia_34928725_Subscription_929x287.jpg
478 ms
Fotolia_45042165_Subscription_XXL_edit1.jpg
662 ms
Fotolia_39289560_Subscription_929_287.jpg
860 ms
anreisserbild.png
671 ms
yamato1.png
585 ms
wetzlich20111.png
681 ms
tr%C3%BCtzschler1.png
683 ms
terratec.png
754 ms
schoenmackers-banner.png
755 ms
ScheidtBachmann1.png
766 ms
mailstore-logo.png
777 ms
loreal1.png
778 ms
niersverband.png
848 ms
NEW.png
848 ms
New_Partner_Wh_Blu.png
862 ms
mx_NDMy.jpg
1064 ms
mailstore-partner-authorized-2900x900.png
1542 ms
trilead.jpg
941 ms
msdn.png
943 ms
oki-Logo.jpg
2946 ms
lenovo.png
1149 ms
ALLNET_rgb_72dpi.jpg
1224 ms
zimbra-divestiture-tn.png
1038 ms
logo_axigen_rgb.jpg
1132 ms
footer_logo.png
1159 ms
call_back.png
1221 ms
input.jpg
1240 ms
border_right.jpg
1249 ms
collect
74 ms
analytics.js
79 ms
collect
5 ms
slider_btm.jpg
1213 ms
footer.png
1136 ms
footer_devider.png
1155 ms
footer_arrow.png
883 ms
select_box.jpg
938 ms
requestcall_back.jpg
939 ms
Fotolia_43958051_Hintergrund_1000x1000.jpg
953 ms
slider_bg.jpg
864 ms
slider_pre.png
924 ms
slider_next.png
854 ms
ajax-loader.gif
876 ms
megabit.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
megabit.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
megabit.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Megabit.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Megabit.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
megabit.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MEGABIT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: