7.4 sec in total
3.1 sec
4.2 sec
61 ms
Visit metasafe.be now to see the best up-to-date METASAFE content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about metasafe.be
Contacteer METASAFE voor inbraakpreventie en inbraakbeveiliging in Vlaanderen!
Visit metasafe.beWe analyzed Metasafe.be page load time and found that the first response time was 3.1 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
metasafe.be performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
3104 ms
29 ms
37 ms
35 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Metasafe.be, 45% (23 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 25% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Metasafe.be.
Page size can be reduced by 293.2 kB (42%)
702.2 kB
409.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Metasafe.be main page is 702.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 374.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 286.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 286.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. METASAFE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (31%)
35
24
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of METASAFE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.metasafe.be
3104 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
29 ms
minified.js
37 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
35 ms
polyfill.min.js
31 ms
thunderbolt-commons.2113c4aa.bundle.min.js
122 ms
main.6c492079.bundle.min.js
121 ms
lodash.min.js
122 ms
react.production.min.js
122 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
125 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
123 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
137 ms
bea144_a64c5549442a401f94a18b8919159e66~mv2.png
196 ms
bundle.min.js
58 ms
bea144_3b025f4f16934d56831548b43564a09b~mv2.jpg
235 ms
Logo.png
299 ms
bea144_d7ac447250594a958d838e73c7882daf~mv2.jpg
215 ms
logo.jpg
185 ms
10.jpg
167 ms
ContentLogo.png
287 ms
7.jpg
305 ms
8.jpg
319 ms
9.jpg
369 ms
het.png
410 ms
maximg_dl_1.jpg
437 ms
bea144_de457bb00e7f477bb55e89ebbdad592f~mv2.jpg
474 ms
bea144_ea935e6ea98642a5a78a58c1c486e4ff~mv2.jpg
562 ms
bea144_e8cd7a93765142d3ae2a69f683f08c97~mv2.jpg
491 ms
bea144_2a35437ff00544ad961211b6019994f8~mv2.jpg
539 ms
bea144_83a65a29eefb4faba7645f59eef796e1~mv2.jpg
591 ms
bea144_1010ac4d16a34b03951458a6dd210111~mv2.jpg
640 ms
bea144_0a1d552cb1ea4dcab52e91eb13afeecf~mv2.jpg
643 ms
106 ms
108 ms
107 ms
105 ms
105 ms
100 ms
138 ms
150 ms
147 ms
149 ms
144 ms
file.woff
337 ms
file.woff
348 ms
file.woff
349 ms
file.woff
370 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
19 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
metasafe.be accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
metasafe.be best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
metasafe.be SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Metasafe.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Metasafe.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
metasafe.be
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of METASAFE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: