4.1 sec in total
347 ms
2.6 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to microsearch.net homepage info - get ready to check Micro Search best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about microsearch.net
Visit microsearch.netWe analyzed Microsearch.net page load time and found that the first response time was 347 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
microsearch.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
36/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
347 ms
155 ms
66 ms
76 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Microsearch.net, 24% (16 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to 0. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (809 ms) belongs to the original domain Microsearch.net.
Page size can be reduced by 168.1 kB (7%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Microsearch.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Micro Search images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Microsearch.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 55% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (85%)
65
10
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Micro Search. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
microsearch.net
347 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
155 ms
style.min.css
66 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
76 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
64 ms
style.css
180 ms
twentytwenty.css
74 ms
um-fonticons-ii.css
147 ms
um-fonticons-fa.css
143 ms
select2.min.css
152 ms
um-crop.css
149 ms
um-modal.css
243 ms
um-styles.css
251 ms
um-profile.css
253 ms
um-account.css
256 ms
um-misc.css
254 ms
um-fileupload.css
278 ms
default.css
341 ms
default.date.css
343 ms
default.time.css
343 ms
um-raty.css
346 ms
simplebar.css
345 ms
um-tipsy.css
378 ms
um-responsive.css
442 ms
um-old-default.css
444 ms
jetpack.css
70 ms
index.js
490 ms
jquery.min.js
106 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
105 ms
um-gdpr.min.js
491 ms
select2.full.min.js
578 ms
underscore.min.js
107 ms
wp-util.min.js
107 ms
um-crop.min.js
590 ms
um-modal.min.js
649 ms
um-jquery-form.min.js
653 ms
um-fileupload.js
655 ms
picker.js
656 ms
picker.date.js
684 ms
picker.time.js
687 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
104 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
104 ms
hooks.min.js
107 ms
i18n.min.js
106 ms
um-raty.min.js
746 ms
um-tipsy.min.js
751 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
106 ms
masonry.min.js
105 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
105 ms
simplebar.min.js
757 ms
um-functions.min.js
756 ms
um-responsive.min.js
809 ms
e-202239.js
101 ms
um-conditional.min.js
804 ms
um-scripts.min.js
728 ms
um-profile.min.js
729 ms
um-account.min.js
727 ms
lukas-blazek-mcSDtbWXUZU-unsplash-2-1024x678.jpg
218 ms
taylor-vick-M5tzZtFCOfs-unsplash-1024x575.jpg
237 ms
helloquence-5fNmWej4tAA-unsplash-1024x683.jpg
191 ms
jamie-street-7ip4yX5P6Q-unsplash-1024x768.jpg
295 ms
laterrian-mcintosh-KXTsofC_T0Q-unsplash-1024x731.jpg
237 ms
katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash-1024x683.jpg
194 ms
logo.png
412 ms
kyle-ryan-HE95D88ZenE-unsplash.jpg
588 ms
8AD3jaY2BkYGDgAWIxIGZiYARCESBmAfMYAAR6AEMAAAABAAAAANXtRbgAAAAA2AhRFAAAAADYCNuG
0 ms
print.css
35 ms
microsearch.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
microsearch.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
microsearch.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microsearch.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Microsearch.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
microsearch.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Micro Search. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: