3 sec in total
234 ms
2.5 sec
277 ms
Click here to check amazing Milagroclub content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about milagroclub.com
Visit milagroclub.comWe analyzed Milagroclub.com page load time and found that the first response time was 234 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
milagroclub.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value3.0 s
79/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value230 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
234 ms
800 ms
299 ms
203 ms
309 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Milagroclub.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (986 ms) belongs to the original domain Milagroclub.com.
Page size can be reduced by 146.2 kB (18%)
826.9 kB
680.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Milagroclub.com main page is 826.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 669.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Milagroclub images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Milagroclub.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (19%)
32
26
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Milagroclub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
milagroclub.com
234 ms
www.milagroclub.com
800 ms
style.css
299 ms
styles.css
203 ms
www.milagroclub.com
309 ms
jquery.min.js
44 ms
milagro.js
202 ms
comment-reply.min.js
203 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
399 ms
jquery.form.min.js
444 ms
scripts.js
304 ms
ga.js
43 ms
milagro-bg.jpg
397 ms
logo2.png
201 ms
gb.png
123 ms
top-slider.png
119 ms
slide014-960x427.jpg
730 ms
slide05.1-960x427.jpg
788 ms
slide041-960x427.jpg
986 ms
slide023-960x427.jpg
827 ms
slide-click-1.png
468 ms
butoom-slide.png
468 ms
butoom-slider1.png
571 ms
cuttom-slider2.png
572 ms
estrellaaaa.png
674 ms
region-h1-hover.1.jpg
771 ms
region-h2-hover.1.jpg
875 ms
region-h3-hover.1.jpg
806 ms
region-h4-hover.1.jpg
863 ms
backgroud-footer.png
874 ms
PTS55F-webfont.woff
904 ms
exo-bold-webfont.woff
911 ms
aller_bd.woff
960 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
exo-bold-italic-webfont.woff
893 ms
download-icon.png
890 ms
question.png
923 ms
log.png
927 ms
milagroclub.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
milagroclub.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
milagroclub.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Milagroclub.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Milagroclub.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
milagroclub.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Milagroclub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: