2.5 sec in total
149 ms
2.3 sec
58 ms
Welcome to moneygram.lu homepage info - get ready to check Moneygram best content right away, or after learning these important things about moneygram.lu
Visit moneygram.luWe analyzed Moneygram.lu page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
moneygram.lu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.4 s
0/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
19/100
10%
Value3,060 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
149 ms
172 ms
62 ms
65 ms
139 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Moneygram.lu, 48% (12 requests) were made to Moneygram.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Moneygram.com.
Page size can be reduced by 12.0 kB (4%)
325.8 kB
313.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Moneygram.lu main page is 325.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 310.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)
22
7
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moneygram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
moneygram.lu
149 ms
en
172 ms
62 ms
Vants-haue-towards-Macb-Cannot-on-euery-herd-whe
65 ms
deployment.js
139 ms
notice
152 ms
runtime.9bfa417693d9ac68.js
151 ms
polyfills.472ad4f7787c5fa4.js
148 ms
vendor.beb2b48790afd1f8.js
1450 ms
main.ce79b2b95941847e.js
1452 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
149 ms
gtm.js
1304 ms
icon
1294 ms
css
1297 ms
enterprise.js
1291 ms
concierge-client.js
1291 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
1233 ms
recaptcha__en.js
123 ms
styles.066aa67b2f84f05f.css
109 ms
352 ms
pixel.js
104 ms
moneygram.jsp
109 ms
c0d2e5f7ca4ef.js
131 ms
rp.gif
70 ms
Vants-haue-towards-Macb-Cannot-on-euery-herd-whe
39 ms
moneygram.lu accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
moneygram.lu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
moneygram.lu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moneygram.lu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Moneygram.lu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
moneygram.lu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Moneygram. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: