6.9 sec in total
438 ms
5.9 sec
559 ms
Click here to check amazing Monogram content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about monogram.partners
UN-SAME YOURSELF! Standing apart from your competition and becoming a world leader starts with daring to do things differently. That's where we come in.
Visit monogram.partnersWe analyzed Monogram.partners page load time and found that the first response time was 438 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
monogram.partners performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.089
92/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
438 ms
218 ms
150 ms
162 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Monogram.partners, 21% (15 requests) were made to Cdn.shortpixel.ai and 7% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Monogram.partners.
Page size can be reduced by 153.6 kB (46%)
330.5 kB
176.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Monogram.partners main page is 330.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 183.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 153.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 153.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Monogram images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 102 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (89%)
62
7
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Monogram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
monogram.partners
438 ms
style.min.css
218 ms
style-index.css
150 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
162 ms
app.css
178 ms
font-awesome.min.css
191 ms
app.css
452 ms
style.css
320 ms
Messina-Sans-Book.css
251 ms
Knockout-HTF28-JuniorFeatherwt.css
261 ms
Knockout-HTF32-JuniorCruiserwt.css
274 ms
js_composer.min.css
510 ms
ytprefs.min.css
344 ms
jquery.min.js
433 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
321 ms
ytprefs.min.js
382 ms
js
81 ms
js
199 ms
site_tracking.js
314 ms
ai-2.0.min.js
326 ms
app.js
307 ms
_0gsap.min.js
759 ms
_1DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
699 ms
_1SplitText.min.js
700 ms
_2ScrollToPlugin.min.js
699 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
697 ms
animsition.js
1603 ms
bezier-easing.js
1801 ms
isInViewport.min.js
952 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
933 ms
jarallax.min.js
1811 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.js
968 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.js
1185 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
2118 ms
jquery.vide.js
1254 ms
js.cookie.js
2128 ms
lazysizes.min.js
1516 ms
mobile-detect.min.js
1883 ms
odometer.min.js
2021 ms
perfect-scrollbar.min.js
2087 ms
PreventGhostClick.js
2751 ms
raf.js
2151 ms
scrollspy.js
3068 ms
slick.min.js
2392 ms
sticky-kit.min.js
2405 ms
swiper.min.js
2412 ms
thb_3dImg.js
2422 ms
typed.min.js
3333 ms
Zhowler.core.min.js
2678 ms
underscore.min.js
2708 ms
app.min.js
2728 ms
fitvids.min.js
2743 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
3411 ms
skrollr.min.js
2686 ms
lazyload.min.js
2760 ms
gtm.js
172 ms
js
64 ms
js
109 ms
analytics.js
104 ms
MessinaSans-Book.otf
60 ms
Knockout-HTF28-JuniorFeatherwt.otf
58 ms
Knockout-HTF32-JuniorCruiserwt.otf
58 ms
collect
29 ms
diffuser.js
31 ms
prism.app-us1.com
90 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2454 ms
MGM_DE01_Background3.jpg
1501 ms
327853199
220 ms
MGM_DE01_Background2.jpg
316 ms
772236069-84c694c06e55b87079f8831218213398c6ff8314f7798e019187f2204369f732-d
229 ms
monogram.partners accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
monogram.partners best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
monogram.partners SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Monogram.partners can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Monogram.partners main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
monogram.partners
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Monogram. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: