8.3 sec in total
407 ms
7.5 sec
373 ms
Welcome to mud-dock.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Mud Dock best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about mud-dock.co.uk
Mud Dock is an iconic bike shop and café in the centre of Bristol, on two floors of the old harbourside building we refurbished in the 1990s.
Visit mud-dock.co.ukWe analyzed Mud-dock.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 407 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
mud-dock.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value15.7 s
0/100
25%
Value18.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.31
38/100
15%
Value20.9 s
2/100
10%
407 ms
2680 ms
126 ms
214 ms
359 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Mud-dock.co.uk, 16% (16 requests) were made to Images.bikecatalogue.uk and 3% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Mud-dock.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 496.7 kB (21%)
2.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Mud-dock.co.uk main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 49.0 kB, which is 52% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.6 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mud Dock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 176.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 176.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mud-dock.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (7%)
92
86
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mud Dock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mud-dock.co.uk
407 ms
www.mud-dock.co.uk
2680 ms
126 ms
modernizr.js
214 ms
359 ms
29d0af
25 ms
I6yk67LgiTE
181 ms
1341934621-Saris_Bones3_Blue_zoom.jpg
617 ms
logo.jpg
155 ms
dot-grey.png
154 ms
social-icon-sprite.gif
191 ms
nav-main-bg-sprite.png
792 ms
dot-white.png
191 ms
2010c940x400.jpg
2314 ms
1822c940x400.jpg
2350 ms
1940c940x400.jpg
2288 ms
968c940x400.jpg
2718 ms
1560c940x400.jpg
2591 ms
310r0x0.jpg
1302 ms
1933r0x0.jpg
1618 ms
1818r736x380.jpg
2370 ms
homepage-tool.jpg
2514 ms
297r0x0.jpg
2569 ms
306r0x0.gif
2463 ms
309r0x0.jpg
2542 ms
307r0x0.jpg
2565 ms
tab-top-border.gif
2618 ms
1793r162x162.jpg
2657 ms
1751r162x162.jpg
2703 ms
1660r162x162.jpg
2756 ms
1576r162x162.jpg
2724 ms
1750r162x162.jpg
2760 ms
1737r162x162.jpg
2773 ms
1502r162x162.jpg
2793 ms
787r162x162.jpg
2814 ms
1572r162x162.jpg
2836 ms
1318r162x162.jpg
2854 ms
1607r162x162.jpg
2864 ms
1663r162x162.jpg
2883 ms
1813r162x162.jpg
2890 ms
1806r162x162.jpg
2908 ms
1852r162x162.jpg
2943 ms
120256.jpg
587 ms
Asset_215867.jpg
586 ms
Asset_215859.jpg
584 ms
121794.jpg
588 ms
Asset_249980.jpg
589 ms
Asset_244818.jpg
660 ms
EQ0043.jpg
662 ms
11228.jpg
662 ms
309165.jpg
662 ms
286971.jpg
668 ms
337168.jpg
670 ms
320921.jpg
735 ms
146682.jpg
740 ms
146354.jpg
739 ms
146348.jpg
738 ms
1973r162x162.jpg
2944 ms
ga.js
27 ms
29D0AF_1_0.woff
3034 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
117 ms
www-embed-player.js
142 ms
base.js
233 ms
29D0AF_0_0.woff
3112 ms
ss-standard.woff
3122 ms
1755r162x162.jpg
3057 ms
1972r162x162.jpg
3027 ms
collect
118 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
56 ms
ad_status.js
52 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
47 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
54 ms
385r162x162.jpg
2470 ms
269r162x162.jpg
2013 ms
1878r162x162.jpg
1723 ms
1901r162x162.jpg
1102 ms
1890r162x162.jpg
1104 ms
1796r162x162.jpg
1081 ms
1384r162x162.jpg
1070 ms
1495r162x162.jpg
997 ms
155r162x162.jpg
955 ms
1795r162x162.jpg
965 ms
1809r162x162.jpg
963 ms
1815r162x162.jpg
972 ms
1350r162x162.jpg
973 ms
1389r162x162.jpg
970 ms
1888r162x162.jpg
939 ms
1955r162x162.jpg
921 ms
1797r162x162.jpg
936 ms
1722r162x162.jpg
934 ms
1716r162x162.jpg
964 ms
1541r162x162.jpg
983 ms
1366r162x162.jpg
992 ms
1568r162x162.jpg
975 ms
1779r162x162.jpg
1005 ms
1526r162x162.jpg
967 ms
footer-bg.jpg
1310 ms
shorts-list-ipad.png
1217 ms
ccSprite.png
1138 ms
mud-dock.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
mud-dock.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
mud-dock.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mud-dock.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mud-dock.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mud-dock.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mud Dock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: