2.4 sec in total
184 ms
1.8 sec
367 ms
Click here to check amazing My Midmark content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about my.midmark.com
Midmark is a global manufacturer and supplier of healthcare products, equipment and diagnostic software for medical, veterinary, and dental markets.
Visit my.midmark.comWe analyzed My.midmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
my.midmark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.9 s
0/100
10%
Value17.5 s
0/100
25%
Value16.0 s
0/100
10%
Value18,650 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value29.0 s
0/100
10%
184 ms
158 ms
234 ms
79 ms
84 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original My.midmark.com, 36% (14 requests) were made to Midmark.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (961 ms) relates to the external source Midmark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 167.3 kB (10%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of My.midmark.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.4 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. My Midmark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 51.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.2 kB or 32% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. My.midmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (53%)
34
16
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of My Midmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
my.midmark.com
184 ms
www.midmark.com
158 ms
gtm.js
234 ms
5b3c3bd9.js
79 ms
main.min.css
84 ms
ScriptResource.axd
421 ms
ScriptResource.axd
475 ms
bootstrap.min.js
450 ms
ScriptResource.axd
500 ms
global-scripts-bundle.js
636 ms
woff.css
401 ms
midmarklogo_fullcolor_notaglinee4a75469e855406fb0547ba5537368f5.png
411 ms
home-hero-1-mobile74f21d94a1e94a2f882150cb4689fd5a.jpg
321 ms
homepage-bg.png
961 ms
midmark-logo-r-small-tagline.png
318 ms
optimize.js
714 ms
hotjar-707348.js
620 ms
pa-52b1fc3dabe53d7a38000000.js
809 ms
bundle.min.js
673 ms
pixel.js
670 ms
fbevents.js
607 ms
js
258 ms
activityi;src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=3438919021142;gtm=2wg9s0;auiddc=478424632.1664687867;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F
659 ms
magnifying-glass.png
441 ms
Avenir-Book.woff
453 ms
Nexa_Bold-webfont.woff
391 ms
Bo4A
42 ms
ai.0.js
404 ms
ns.html
209 ms
modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js
225 ms
398561344199985
81 ms
activityi;src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=934753258;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F
138 ms
src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=3438919021142;gtm=2wg9s0;auiddc=478424632.1664687867;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F
231 ms
analytics.js
89 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
188 ms
src=8826991;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;ord=934753258;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.midmark.com%2F
113 ms
collect
90 ms
ytc.js
218 ms
icon
231 ms
my.midmark.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
my.midmark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
my.midmark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise My.midmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that My.midmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
my.midmark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of My Midmark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: