3.5 sec in total
481 ms
2.7 sec
303 ms
Visit mybestoption.es now to see the best up-to-date Mybestoption content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mybestoption.es
Compara las mejores tarifas de ADSL, Fibra, Telefonía móvil, Electricidad y TV y ahorra en tus facturas con MyBest.es
Visit mybestoption.esWe analyzed Mybestoption.es page load time and found that the first response time was 481 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
mybestoption.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value5.4 s
57/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
481 ms
630 ms
25 ms
102 ms
311 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mybestoption.es, 33% (24 requests) were made to Mybest.es and 16% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (630 ms) relates to the external source Mybest.es.
Page size can be reduced by 499.0 kB (54%)
926.9 kB
427.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Mybestoption.es main page is 926.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 321.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mybestoption images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 201.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.2 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 201.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mybestoption.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (33%)
58
39
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mybestoption. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mybestoption.es
481 ms
www.mybest.es
630 ms
css
25 ms
font-awesome.min.css
102 ms
mb-default.css
311 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
308 ms
jquery.form.min.js
202 ms
main.js
200 ms
gpt.js
14 ms
_provider_icon_output.php
414 ms
mb.desktop.bgPage.gif
185 ms
mb.logo.png
186 ms
mb.number.phone.png
186 ms
home_jazztel_es.jpg
186 ms
home_masmovil_es.jpg
186 ms
home_e-on_es.jpg
210 ms
home_ono_es.jpg
209 ms
mb.underCostruction.png
210 ms
la-cope.jpg
209 ms
cadena-ser.jpg
209 ms
avui-el-punt.jpg
209 ms
f1-y-motogp-en-2016-las-veras-por-movistar.jpg
407 ms
fusion-contigo-30mb-todo-en-uno.jpg
308 ms
mb.adigital.png
307 ms
_provider_icon_output.php
409 ms
_provider_icon_output.php
424 ms
_provider_icon_output.php
425 ms
mb.desktop.sprite.png
485 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
31 ms
mb.loghi.sprite.jpg
434 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
27 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
438 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
29 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
28 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
28 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
29 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxlDMrAYtoOisqqMDW9M_Mqc.ttf
28 ms
mb.desktop.overlay.png
321 ms
ga.js
73 ms
sdk.js
297 ms
widgets.js
127 ms
platform.js
80 ms
ads
101 ms
container.html
24 ms
__utm.gif
31 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
8 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
7 ms
sharebutton
104 ms
postmessageRelay
68 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
185 ms
15803717296968219355
63 ms
10030147830389878878
86 ms
12385577655496392565
125 ms
osd.js
13 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
52 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
52 ms
rs=AGLTcCOFe0ICGMfEiURrBMnTsZI9m_OXug
22 ms
rs=AGLTcCM1Q7RKrMUtzLz2YJcKK3e92AJ7QQ
57 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
72 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
73 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
25 ms
24 ms
xd_arbiter.php
219 ms
xd_arbiter.php
425 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.es.html
61 ms
like.php
96 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
547 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
612 ms
jot
91 ms
mybestoption.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
mybestoption.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
mybestoption.es SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mybestoption.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Spanish. Our system also found out that Mybestoption.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mybestoption.es
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mybestoption. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: