6.2 sec in total
2.4 sec
3.5 sec
273 ms
Visit mysteriouspress.com now to see the best up-to-date Mysterious Press content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mysteriouspress.com
Home Page
Visit mysteriouspress.comWe analyzed Mysteriouspress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
mysteriouspress.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.4 s
93/100
10%
2441 ms
26 ms
176 ms
269 ms
271 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Mysteriouspress.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Mysteriouspress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 47.8 kB (13%)
363.4 kB
315.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Mysteriouspress.com main page is 363.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 310.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mysterious Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (9%)
45
41
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mysterious Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mysteriouspress.com
2441 ms
jquery.min.js
26 ms
jspacker.asp
176 ms
csspacker.asp
269 ms
all.js
271 ms
header-bg9.jpg
180 ms
search-button.gif
106 ms
content-shadow.jpg
167 ms
new-banner-without-logo.jpg
282 ms
goldsborough-for-website.jpg
424 ms
contestheader.jpg
371 ms
peters-01morbidbones-ebooks.jpg
204 ms
queen-studyinterror.jpg
281 ms
swollen-red-sun.jpg
282 ms
williams-anddeepblue.jpg
301 ms
archie-crosshairs.jpg
346 ms
corbett-bloodparadise.jpg
355 ms
starnes-calling.jpg
371 ms
dead-faherty.jpg
395 ms
siegel-cover.jpg
437 ms
cauffiel-eyebeholder.jpg
450 ms
halliday-headsyoulose.jpg
456 ms
klavan-mrswhite.jpg
466 ms
hughes-ridepink.jpg
485 ms
buckley-savingqueen.jpg
531 ms
day-sherlockholmes.jpg
534 ms
cain-completecrime.jpg
575 ms
doyle-houndbaskervilles.jpg
550 ms
last-drive-stout.jpg
567 ms
george-mysteriousdisappearance.jpg
575 ms
ross.jpeg
624 ms
bookshop-logo.jpg
744 ms
new-facebook.jpg
641 ms
new-twitter.jpg
657 ms
new-rss.jpg
663 ms
new-youtube.jpg
666 ms
tumblr.jpg
717 ms
ga.js
7 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
like.php
178 ms
zwaoNywIX8f.js
481 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
545 ms
55 ms
xd_arbiter.php
210 ms
xd_arbiter.php
416 ms
ping
55 ms
mysteriouspress.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
mysteriouspress.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
mysteriouspress.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mysteriouspress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mysteriouspress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mysteriouspress.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mysterious Press. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: