1.9 sec in total
432 ms
1.4 sec
71 ms
Welcome to nationalreview.com homepage info - get ready to check National Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about nationalreview.com
Leading conservative magazine and website covering news, politics, current events, and culture with detailed analysis and commentary.
Visit nationalreview.comWe analyzed Nationalreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 432 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
nationalreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value18.7 s
0/100
25%
Value17.3 s
0/100
10%
Value16,370 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value55.9 s
0/100
10%
432 ms
593 ms
141 ms
226 ms
136 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Nationalreview.com, 16% (7 requests) were made to A10.nationalreview.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (593 ms) relates to the external source Cmp.inmobi.com.
Page size can be reduced by 762.0 kB (58%)
1.3 MB
549.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Nationalreview.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 787.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 711.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 711.9 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nationalreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (66%)
41
14
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of National Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.nationalreview.com
432 ms
choice.js
593 ms
script.js
141 ms
0c41544c-29f9-4780-aec0-693eebfe42cf.js
226 ms
0c41544c-29f9-4780-aec0-693eebfe42cf.js
136 ms
debug-bar-searchpress.css
23 ms
index.js
44 ms
script.js
131 ms
a-0316.min.js
73 ms
spm.v1.min.js
75 ms
beacon.js
129 ms
app.bundle.min.js
62 ms
logger-insert.js
55 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
121 ms
fonts.min.css
58 ms
gtm.js
219 ms
fbevents.js
147 ms
95a85abc6ad70947e8e8c56b7.index.js
216 ms
p.js
142 ms
app.min.css
137 ms
493
77 ms
493
62 ms
p.js
73 ms
41832180222d18173bcfd5ceab689d89
73 ms
js
52 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
partner
177 ms
destination
184 ms
9516.js
268 ms
destination
181 ms
quant.js
180 ms
bat.js
264 ms
9a9fb71dcbd47dc2c7ea2eb049f0ff5d
36 ms
LB-Zone-3
164 ms
493
245 ms
cmp2-polyfilled.js
89 ms
j
145 ms
collect
97 ms
collect
138 ms
68 ms
80 ms
geoip
12 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
24 ms
nationalreview.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
nationalreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
nationalreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nationalreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nationalreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nationalreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of National Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: