Tools & Wizards About Us
natura.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 46

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

natura.org

Natura 2000 | the Natura 2000 Networking Programme - Natura 2000 at work

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

870 ms

Page Rendered

84 ms

natura.org screenshot

About Website

Visit natura.org now to see the best up-to-date Natura content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about natura.org

the Natura Network Intiative - Natura 2000 resource

Visit natura.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Natura.org page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 954 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

natura.org performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

natura.org

362 ms

nnp_leaflet.jpg

509 ms

counter.js

84 ms

t.php

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Natura.org, 25% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com and 25% (1 request) were made to C.statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (509 ms) belongs to the original domain Natura.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

44.8 kB

After Optimization

41.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Natura.org main page is 44.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 26.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 3.6 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Natura images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 15.1 kB
  • After minification 15.1 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Natura. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

natura.org

natura.org

362 ms

nnp_leaflet.jpg

nnp_leaflet.jpg

509 ms

counter.js

counter.js

84 ms

t.php

t.php

138 ms

Accessibility Review

natura.org accessibility score

46

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

natura.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

natura.org SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Natura.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Natura.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

natura.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Natura. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: