9.2 sec in total
403 ms
7.4 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Navtark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about navtark.com
Hire the Web and Mobile App development experts for PHP, Java, Android and iOS services. Your offshore team for reliable Software Development and Web Designing
Visit navtark.comWe analyzed Navtark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 403 ms and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
navtark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value22.3 s
0/100
25%
Value20.4 s
0/100
10%
Value3,980 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value23.2 s
1/100
10%
403 ms
767 ms
1827 ms
78 ms
546 ms
Our browser made a total of 137 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Navtark.com, 25% (34 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Navtark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 293.7 kB (25%)
1.2 MB
876.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Navtark.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 545.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 280.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 280.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Navtark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Navtark.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (86%)
90
13
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Navtark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
navtark.com
403 ms
navtark.com
767 ms
www.navtark.com
1827 ms
js
78 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
546 ms
main.min.css
576 ms
css
38 ms
menu-animation.min.css
447 ms
style.min.css
574 ms
style.min.css
773 ms
style.min.css
585 ms
style.min.css
589 ms
style.min.css
596 ms
css
36 ms
font-awesome.min.css
776 ms
jquery-ui.css
779 ms
simple-job-board-public.css
788 ms
style.css
784 ms
dashicons.min.css
1059 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
963 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
966 ms
swiper.min.css
970 ms
post-7.css
971 ms
custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css
981 ms
all.min.css
1156 ms
v4-shims.min.css
1159 ms
global.css
1159 ms
post-1777.css
1161 ms
post-4763.css
1173 ms
post-3439.css
1261 ms
ekiticons.css
1350 ms
style.css
1357 ms
widget-styles.css
1365 ms
responsive.css
1354 ms
general.min.css
1382 ms
css
32 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1470 ms
brands.min.css
1539 ms
solid.min.css
1538 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
1556 ms
jquery.min.js
1561 ms
widget.js
50 ms
css
15 ms
css
15 ms
api.js
64 ms
default-passive-events
43 ms
dcavutabrfprj76opatbncts9emzb5sz.js
164 ms
widget-posts.min.css
1397 ms
default-passive-events@2.0.0
15 ms
index.umd.js
17 ms
custom-widget-icon-list.min.css
1305 ms
post-10285.css
1327 ms
animations.min.css
1293 ms
rs6.css
1166 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1177 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1177 ms
frontend.min.js
1627 ms
rbtools.min.js
1622 ms
rs6.min.js
1634 ms
frontend-script.js
1444 ms
widget-scripts.js
1459 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
1478 ms
general.min.js
1661 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1468 ms
maxmegamenu.js
1475 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1461 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1472 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1592 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1561 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1461 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1460 ms
hooks.min.js
1467 ms
i18n.min.js
1483 ms
frontend.min.js
1585 ms
waypoints.min.js
1546 ms
core.min.js
1455 ms
frontend.min.js
1455 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1462 ms
animate-circle.min.js
1469 ms
elementor.js
1566 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1524 ms
underscore.min.js
1463 ms
wp-util.min.js
1449 ms
frontend.min.js
1457 ms
dummy.png
1308 ms
nav.webp
1326 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
452 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff
452 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
453 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff
454 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff
453 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff
455 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
454 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff
451 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff
454 ms
elementskit.woff
1963 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
455 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
455 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
456 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
455 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
456 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
456 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
457 ms
font
457 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
458 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
457 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
458 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
459 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
458 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
458 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
459 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
460 ms
silder-footer.webp
1844 ms
partbg-300x200.jpg
1262 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1582 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1644 ms
eicons.woff
1515 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1390 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
55 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
53 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
56 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
55 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
54 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
55 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
57 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
55 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
56 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1499 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1526 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1570 ms
New-Logo.png
1622 ms
whatsapp_other.webp
1476 ms
recaptcha__en.js
29 ms
ns1.webp
1391 ms
ns2.webp
1774 ms
ns3.webp
1592 ms
ns4.webp
1995 ms
navtark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
navtark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
navtark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Navtark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Navtark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
navtark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Navtark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: