7.8 sec in total
512 ms
6.4 sec
899 ms
Click here to check amazing Net For Choice content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about netforchoice.com
NetForChoice is the Noida based No. 1 Data Center in India. Want to host any solutions, then connect with our expert team.
Visit netforchoice.comWe analyzed Netforchoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 512 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
netforchoice.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value3,280 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
512 ms
2636 ms
889 ms
654 ms
672 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Netforchoice.com, 14% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 2% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Netforchoice.com.
Page size can be reduced by 330.4 kB (43%)
769.2 kB
438.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Netforchoice.com main page is 769.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 475.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 314.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 314.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Net For Choice images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Netforchoice.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (26%)
91
67
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Net For Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
netforchoice.com
512 ms
www.netforchoice.com
2636 ms
bootstrap.min.css
889 ms
style.css
654 ms
services-main.css
672 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
677 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
693 ms
dmeqn1jaqr
688 ms
hero-banner-bg.webp
591 ms
logo.png
577 ms
highlighter.svg
787 ms
arrow-whi.png
580 ms
bare-metal-server.webp
584 ms
windows-dedicated-server.webp
577 ms
nvme-server.webp
799 ms
linux-server.webp
796 ms
vps-server.webp
801 ms
superior-performance.webp
1040 ms
phishing-protection.webp
822 ms
server-management.webp
1001 ms
bg-world.png
1453 ms
prime-choice.webp
1237 ms
acronis.webp
1022 ms
amazon-web-service.webp
1054 ms
cpanel.webp
1216 ms
dell.webp
1246 ms
icewarp.webp
1266 ms
microsoft-partner.webp
1254 ms
microsoft-spla-partner.webp
1398 ms
oracle.webp
1422 ms
softlayer.webp
1435 ms
zimbra.webp
1461 ms
aws.webp
1485 ms
plesk.webp
1612 ms
tally.webp
1629 ms
azure.webp
1632 ms
google-cloud.webp
1648 ms
vaultizelogo.webp
1674 ms
google-review-icon-50.png
1705 ms
hostingseeker-logo-new50.png
1813 ms
hostadvice.png
1842 ms
Trustpilot_logo50.png
1846 ms
jquery.min.js
1794 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
1606 ms
clarity.js
28 ms
owl.carousel.js
1418 ms
main.js
1501 ms
custom.js
1535 ms
lazysizes.min.js
1534 ms
website-planet.png
1705 ms
tally-on-cloud.webp
1510 ms
busy-on-cloud.webp
1534 ms
marg-on-cloud.webp
1536 ms
next-arrow.png
1536 ms
prev-arrow.png
1547 ms
jatin.webp
1413 ms
nishant.webp
1438 ms
ritika.webp
1469 ms
men-with-folded-hands.png
1500 ms
fb.png
1342 ms
tw.png
1355 ms
in.png
1396 ms
yt.png
1425 ms
default
109 ms
acronis.webp
430 ms
amazon-web-service.webp
484 ms
cpanel.webp
484 ms
dell.webp
522 ms
icewarp.webp
577 ms
microsoft-partner.webp
633 ms
microsoft-spla-partner.webp
643 ms
oracle.webp
703 ms
softlayer.webp
702 ms
zimbra.webp
747 ms
aws.webp
801 ms
plesk.webp
863 ms
tally.webp
856 ms
azure.webp
919 ms
google-cloud.webp
920 ms
vaultizelogo.webp
963 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
216 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
79 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
77 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
68 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
66 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
76 ms
twk-main.js
114 ms
twk-vendor.js
177 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
226 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
215 ms
twk-runtime.js
142 ms
twk-app.js
168 ms
c.gif
43 ms
netforchoice.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
netforchoice.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
netforchoice.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Netforchoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Netforchoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
netforchoice.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Net For Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: