2.8 sec in total
154 ms
2 sec
663 ms
Visit newlook.org now to see the best up-to-date Newlook content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about newlook.org
As patient & physician, ours relationship is a partnership based on trust. I want you to get the best possible care & result from your cosmetic surgery.
Visit newlook.orgWe analyzed Newlook.org page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
newlook.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.4 s
0/100
10%
Value30.1 s
0/100
25%
Value15.4 s
0/100
10%
Value1,940 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.61
10/100
15%
Value30.3 s
0/100
10%
154 ms
81 ms
57 ms
62 ms
338 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Newlook.org, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (940 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (30%)
7.9 MB
5.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Newlook.org main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 212.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 212.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 430.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Newlook images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 589.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 589.4 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Newlook.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (74%)
57
15
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Newlook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.newlook.org
154 ms
style.min.css
81 ms
styles.css
57 ms
simple-staff-list-public.css
62 ms
simple-staff-list-custom.css
338 ms
ecwd_popup.css
62 ms
font-awesome.css
87 ms
style.css
112 ms
full-styles.6.10.6.css
153 ms
mkhb-render.css
84 ms
mkhb-row.css
98 ms
mkhb-column.css
99 ms
js_composer.min.css
304 ms
theme-options-production-1694445661.css
118 ms
shortcodes-styles.min.css
272 ms
webfontloader.js
118 ms
jquery.min.js
152 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
136 ms
js
72 ms
css
32 ms
ecwd_popup.js
152 ms
core.min.js
155 ms
mouse.min.js
167 ms
draggable.min.js
169 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
173 ms
masonry.min.js
188 ms
scripts.js
188 ms
index.js
192 ms
index.js
209 ms
smoothscroll.js
206 ms
full-scripts.6.10.6.js
284 ms
mkhb-render.js
225 ms
mkhb-column.js
229 ms
shortcodes-scripts.min.js
261 ms
api.js
49 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
251 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
283 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
301 ms
index.js
299 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
299 ms
tabs.min.js
267 ms
jquery-ui-tabs-rotate.min.js
262 ms
akismet-frontend.js
262 ms
css
65 ms
icon_dr-tobin_tr_200.png
115 ms
logo_dr-tobin_w_tr.png
78 ms
logo_dr-tobin_w_lite_tr-1.png
77 ms
img_dr-tobin-beauty-for-life-partnership_notext.png
143 ms
txt_its-a-partnership.png
79 ms
txt_beauty-for-life.png
141 ms
img_dr-tobin-beauty-for-life-partnership_notext_narrow.jpg
145 ms
img_dr-howard-tobin_tr-1-1920x1920.png
238 ms
dummy-transparent-qc9dfwe4uzlerpifr75kvk3jf6tam79gnyv3h38aqo.png
141 ms
img_stockimage1.png
196 ms
selectbox-arrow.png
143 ms
font
94 ms
font
940 ms
calendar.css
208 ms
font
820 ms
recaptcha__en.js
447 ms
newlook.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
newlook.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
newlook.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Newlook.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Newlook.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
newlook.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Newlook. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: