2.4 sec in total
536 ms
1.6 sec
170 ms
Click here to check amazing Next Mark content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nextmark.com
Our mission is simple: we help you successfully reach your market. That’s why NextMark is focused on giving you exactly what you need for successful media planning, media operations and media sales. F...
Visit nextmark.comWe analyzed Nextmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 536 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
nextmark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value1,220 ms
20/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
536 ms
118 ms
82 ms
86 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Nextmark.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (536 ms) belongs to the original domain Nextmark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 357.8 kB (36%)
1.0 MB
646.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Nextmark.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 521.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Next Mark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 202.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 202.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nextmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (30%)
61
43
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Next Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.nextmark.com
536 ms
style.css
118 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
82 ms
quotes-collection.css
86 ms
jquery.js
192 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
81 ms
quotes-collection.js
84 ms
jquery.js
208 ms
custom.js
173 ms
integrate.js
127 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
171 ms
comment-reply.min.js
126 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
42 ms
ga.js
68 ms
bg_body.gif
52 ms
logo_nextmark.png
49 ms
bg_util.gif
47 ms
divider_util.gif
44 ms
icon_arrow_gray.gif
44 ms
icon_phone.png
46 ms
bg_call_today.png
102 ms
bg_nav.jpg
101 ms
icon_arrow_blue.gif
101 ms
bg_subnav_top.png
99 ms
button_search.gif
104 ms
bg_field_search.gif
97 ms
bg_search_dropdown.png
151 ms
nav_home2_on.png
142 ms
nav_home1.png
144 ms
nav_home3.png
148 ms
nav_home4.png
151 ms
photo_home2.jpg
225 ms
bg_all_about_relevance.png
189 ms
button_get_trial.png
186 ms
photo_home1.jpg
264 ms
bg_your_audience.png
190 ms
button_try_search.png
190 ms
photo_home3.jpg
268 ms
bg_accuracy_simple.png
232 ms
button_learn_more.png
231 ms
photo_home4.jpg
269 ms
bg_win_media_plan.png
265 ms
button_get_started.png
273 ms
bg_home_barkers.gif
273 ms
mailing-list-finder.png
306 ms
divider_horiz_pointer.gif
306 ms
thumb_newsletter.jpg
307 ms
bg_button_gold.gif
315 ms
icon_arrow_goldwhite.gif
314 ms
logo_nextmark_footer.gif
313 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
bg_all_your_solutions.gif
313 ms
bg_contact_us.gif
316 ms
logo_dma.gif
315 ms
logo_bbb.gif
317 ms
logo_nemoa.gif
318 ms
logo_dmcny.gif
316 ms
logo_iab.gif
300 ms
logo_vtnh.gif
301 ms
nav_home1_on.png
303 ms
nav_home3_on.png
257 ms
nav_home4_on.png
47 ms
nextmark.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
nextmark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
nextmark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nextmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nextmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nextmark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Next Mark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: