Tools & Wizards About Us
nicerock.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

nicerock.in

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

212 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

114 ms

nicerock.in screenshot

About Website

Visit nicerock.in now to see the best up-to-date Nicerock content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nicerock.in

Nicerock.in Bengali Movie Mp3 Songs ,Bajirao Mastani mp3 Song,Bajirao Mastani Video song,Sultan (2016) Movie Songs,Sultan (2016) Salman Khan Video Song,purulia HD video Song , nagpuri Video song ,bhoj...

Visit nicerock.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Nicerock.in page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nicerock.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

nicerock.in

212 ms

index.xhtml

328 ms

styles.css

201 ms

Api.php

569 ms

union_html5_sdk.js

277 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Nicerock.in, 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Wapkaimage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Img.ucweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 66.1 kB (41%)

Content Size

162.3 kB

After Optimization

96.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nicerock.in main page is 162.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 135.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 16.1 kB

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 240 B
  • After minification 240 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nicerock images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 45.3 kB

  • Original 135.0 kB
  • After minification 135.0 kB
  • After compression 89.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nicerock.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (31%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nicerock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nicerock.in

nicerock.in

212 ms

index.xhtml

index.xhtml

328 ms

styles.css

styles.css

201 ms

Api.php

Api.php

569 ms

union_html5_sdk.js

union_html5_sdk.js

277 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

6 ms

200121223_98fbddfaa5.png

200121223_98fbddfaa5.png

195 ms

700821966_f43b608a88.gif

700821966_f43b608a88.gif

199 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

6 ms

index.php

index.php

418 ms

index.php

index.php

425 ms

d7ae1089b4a69c94e583993b4b8768e5.gif

d7ae1089b4a69c94e583993b4b8768e5.gif

1722 ms

335 ms

330 ms

SEO Factors

nicerock.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nicerock.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Nicerock.in main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

nicerock.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nicerock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: