Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

ninova.com

Akıllı Yaşam Çözümleri - Ninova SmartLife

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

ninova.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ninova content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ninova.com

Ninova Smartlife Akıllı Yaşam Çözümleri ile eski veya yeni fark etmez bütün yapılarınızı akıllı ev konseptine taşıyabilirsiniz.

Visit ninova.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ninova.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ninova.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,900 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ninova.com

1442 ms

analytics.js

16 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

421 ms

validationEngine.jquery.css

420 ms

layerslider.css

425 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Ninova.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ninova.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (61%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Ninova.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 501.9 kB

  • Original 558.9 kB
  • After minification 557.0 kB
  • After compression 57.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 501.9 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 36.0 kB

  • Original 708.8 kB
  • After minification 672.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ninova images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 886.7 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 304.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 886.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 387.5 kB

  • Original 506.6 kB
  • After minification 413.4 kB
  • After compression 119.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ninova.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 387.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (63%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ninova. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ninova.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ninova.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ninova.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ninova.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ninova.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ninova. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: