3.4 sec in total
381 ms
2.9 sec
168 ms
Click here to check amazing Nordhaven content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nordhaven.io
Ontdek alle groeikansen voor jouw SaaS business in één dag in de SaaS Marketing Workshop van Nordhaven. 100% gericht op B2B SaaS.
Visit nordhaven.ioWe analyzed Nordhaven.io page load time and found that the first response time was 381 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
nordhaven.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.4 s
0/100
10%
Value17.3 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value1,950 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.059
98/100
15%
Value19.7 s
2/100
10%
381 ms
1205 ms
638 ms
277 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Nordhaven.io, 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Nordhaven.io.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (73%)
2.0 MB
527.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Nordhaven.io main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nordhaven images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 509.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 509.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 906.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nordhaven.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 906.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (68%)
25
8
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nordhaven. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nordhaven.io
381 ms
nordhaven.io
1205 ms
autoptimize_397b6e4896a252d6af96bc3a85156eab.css
638 ms
autoptimize_single_dde2d4ba383d215baf9927e098c0c22b.css
277 ms
css
26 ms
dashicons.min.css
462 ms
jquery.min.js
468 ms
css
38 ms
css
42 ms
autoptimize_26e798ff73a4e5dd6da2a319b0d2ce6f.js
844 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
101 ms
gtm.js
89 ms
05910483a02276e352e1d9589.js
137 ms
hotjar-352567.js
139 ms
font
24 ms
font
29 ms
modules.ttf
376 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
insight.min.js
95 ms
88 ms
fbevents.js
54 ms
ping.js
98 ms
NORDHAVEN-logo-PMS-289.png
114 ms
modules.3ba69200791f16077ba8.js
71 ms
IMG_2498-1024x601.jpg
106 ms
collect
39 ms
collect
39 ms
js
52 ms
41 ms
ga-audiences
42 ms
nordhaven.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
nordhaven.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
nordhaven.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nordhaven.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nordhaven.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nordhaven.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nordhaven. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: